Talk:Leucojum
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
the classification seem to be wrong: compare interwiki link: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fr%C3%BChlings-Knotenblume
- This genus appears to be a victim of conflicting classification schemes. ITIS gives the family as Liliaceae but it is included in the Amaryllidaceae article. The Amaryllidaceae is considered to be a separate family by many authors but was once part of the Liliaceae so the classification is less wrong than antiquated. Thanks for pointing out the discrepancy. -- WormRunner | Talk 22:06, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- That´s very interesting. Thanks for this interesting information. --Sjoehest for german Wikipedia (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Sjoehest )
Picture identification
editI suspect that the close-up picture of the flowers in the taxo box is the Summer Snowflake, not the Spring Snowflake, as it shows several flowers held close together (rare in L. vernum) and the flowers do not have the characteristic angular "lampshade" shape of L. vernum. SiGarb 11:30, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
The article "Snowflake" needs to be reduced to a stub pointing to articles on the genera Leucojum and Acis, with a brief discussion of the basis for separating the two genera and reviving the old genus Acis. Alternatively, point to the PBS Wiki for detailed discussion. The text of the present wikipedia article seems to be a holdover from before the recent segregation of the smaller snowflake species into genus Acis. The pictures of the two Leucojum species are now correctly identified. 207.216.27.140 06:36, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Leucojum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150430170312/http://www.plantlife.org.uk/wild_plants/county_flowers/ to http://www.plantlife.org.uk/wild_plants/county_flowers/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150430170312/http://www.plantlife.org.uk/wild_plants/county_flowers/ to http://www.plantlife.org.uk/wild_plants/county_flowers/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 14 May 2017 (UTC)