Talk:Lever frame

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Trains: Operations Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Operations task force.

This article lacks references.

UK-centric

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article obviously needs globalization. Not mentioning major Continental concepts and companies is certainly an ommission that must be fixed. In addition, it seems to me that not even overseas, especially North American practice is sufficiently covered (but I might be wrong here, and not much can be said about lever frames e.g. in the US). haraldmmueller 17:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haraldmmueller (talk • contribs)

One of the main editors here and on the Signalling control page is rather critical of contributions so instead of getting into Talk page fights I washed my hands of the whole mess and informed him that he was more than welcome to do a better job. That was in 2008 and the information has been pretty much gone unchanged since then.Sturmovik (talk) 13:50, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic