Talk:Lexington Hills, California
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lexington Hills, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2 to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editI propose to merge Lexington Hills (Santa Clara County, California) (for the census county division - CCD) into Lexington Hills, California (for the census designated place - CDP). The two pages seem to be referring to the same area (if not the same, they seem to greatly overlap). The I think that the content in the CCD article can be added in as a section of the CDP article, as the CCD article is not very expansive. Having two pages referring to the same general area seems confusing, especially which each page is not very unique. If they are to remain separate, it would be good to expand both articles to show their uniqueness and further explain the relation between the CCD and CDP to justify separate articles. Gimelthedog (talk) 13:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)