Talk:Liars, Leakers, and Liberals

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Animalparty in topic Promotion

Promotion

edit

The Promotion section's description of what happened with Goldberg is both too detailed and fails NPOV. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

How does it fail NPOV? It gives both sides, it's supported completely by reliable sources. Do you have any specifics to offer for what you see as POV? -- ψλ 05:39, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
It's verifiable, but overblown in proportion to the topic (Also, rather unprofessional IMO). In 10 years will a viral news item still be worth including in an encyclopedia?? Mere verifiability does not mandate inclusion, and isolated events should not be given undue coverage per WP:PROPORTION and WP:WEIGHT. NPOV means some info of lesser importance should be pared down to create a well structured, fairly weighted article. It is a shame that so many Wikipedia articles are generated almost entirely from daily news and churnalism sources that give zero consideration to the lasting significance of their articles. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply