Talk:Liber diversarum arcium

PREMATURE INTERVENTION

GURT POSH please leave this article alone for an hour or so - if you look at the history, you will see I am actually at this moment in the middle of making this page, and due to your intervention, I have lost a load of edits - ironically precisely those your header requests. Please look at the date and time of edits in history before making changes - I mean, thanks for looking at it, but give me a moment to write it first! This goes for you, Beeswaxcandle.

I know you are both trying to be helpful, but it is impossible to compose an article of someone else is also making edits - I keep losing edits due to "edit conflicts" Please leave this article alone until 2 June

Your well-intentioned efforts have caused me massive frustration and lost me (a) time, and (b) the will to contribute to wikipedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Markeyatgnapcorg (talk • contribs)

At the time I added the categories and tags, the page asked for contributions up at the top. So contribute I did. I'm sorry you've lost edits, but if you'd like more time to edit the article, then please consider either adding Template:Under construction, or moving the article to a WP:User subpage to give you time to work on the page. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing environment, so you can expect more edits like mine unless you isolate the article for solo editing for a while. Would you like me to move it to a user subpage for you? Gurt Posh (talk) 10:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

REPLY

AAARGH!!!!!! I just typed a whole long reply into your talk page which was then ITSELF lost as you were modifying it yourself! - I havent yet figured out how to use the Talk pages! Or how to recover my changes when there is a conflict. Here goes again: So, hi! and thanks for your very helpful reply - (Template:Under construction is a good idea) I didnt add anything requesting contributions,presumably that was WP automated. THANKS - sorry to bite your head off, but as I said - if you looked at the dates of edits, you'd see I was in the middle of it. I think next time I am going to write the whole thing in Word and wikify it all at once. New to all this - creating page on spur of moment!

THANK YOU all the same! m— Preceding unsigned comment added by Markeyatgnapcorg (talk • contribs)

Not to worry: to recover your changes in an edit conflict, just hit the "back" button on your web browser, and your edits will re-appear as they were. You can't then save that directly with the Wikipedia "save" button, but you can copy and paste the contents either back to a fresh edit of the page, or to a separate text editor, etc.

Please don't get discouraged by the trials of working online in Wikipedia: I hope you'll stick around and contribute. The article looks great so far. Please ask at my talk page if you have any questions. Thanks, Gurt Posh (talk) 10:16, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

THANKS!

Thanks! OK, I'm logging off for the afternoon - it's all yours! Feel free to tinker, and I'll have a look in six hours or so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markeyatgnapcorg (talk • contribs) 10:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liber diversarum arcium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070221162247/http://www.uhb.fr/alc/medieval/cd10/Oltrogge.pdf to http://www.uhb.fr/alc/medieval/cd10/Oltrogge.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)