Talk:Liberal–National party merger
The contents of the Liberal–National party merger page were merged into Coalition (Australia)#Suggestions to merge on 19 September 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposed merge
editI'm not clear on what this article is about: is it about the Coalition, a proposed coalition, a merger between parties, a proposed merger between parties, an event that changed the composition of the Coalition? The inconsistent use of "coalition" and "Coalition" is also confusing (e.g., in the lead, using the word "coalition" in lowercase to link to an article about the "Coalition" with a capital "C").
I suggest that this content would be better served in another article, probably Coalition (Australia), or possibly Liberal National Party? —sroc (talk) 04:34, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, it is quiet confusing and can be culled down to fit in the 'parent article' without much disruption. Романов (talk) 01:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- The repeated proposals for mergers between the various bits of the Liberals and the Nationals is a subject independent of both the Coalition (Australia) and the individual players, such as the Liberal National Party. I don't think any merger would help. This is just a very poor article. Deleting it would be no real loss. HiLo48 (talk) 23:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- If there's going to be a merger, I think it should be with the Liberal National Party of Queensland article.--Forward Unto Dawn 11:01, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Liberal–National party merger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080203180456/http://www.news.com.au/story/0%2C23599%2C23136822-5007146%2C00.html to http://www.news.com.au/story/0%2C23599%2C23136822-5007146%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 15 May 2017 (UTC)