Talk:Liberal National Party of Queensland

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Marcnut1996 in topic Dutton and Littleproud

Old comment

edit

Just a heads up that the National Party of Australia and the Liberal Party of Australia may merge in the coming weeks in Queensland, the proposed name is the Liberal National Party. Cheers, WikiTownsvillian 09:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article title

edit

Should the title of this article be Liberal National Party? It seems that there are no other 'Liberal National' parties in Wikipedia, so shouldn't this article occupy that space? --Lester 00:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The "Liberal National Party" was also the name of a significant British political party between 1931 and 1948 when it changed the name to "National Liberal Party" (which was also the name used by a different group of Liberals between 1916 & 1923). It was arguably the single most important third party in the UK in the twentieth century, forming a key part of the 1930s National (i.e. coalition) Governments with its leader holding most of the highest offices at one point or another. A Google search for "Liberal National Party" brings up hits for both the British and Australian parties in the top ten. Until two days ago Liberal National Party had been redirecting to the UK party for years. It now points to the "National Liberal Party" disambiguation page. Timrollpickering (talk) 10:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Paragraph 'party in opposition'

edit

This paragraph was marked as 'citation needed'. It seems a pretty logically nonsensical application of the tag, IMO. I can be a bit pedantic, I suppose...

It's a bit difficult to work out just why this was so tagged - unless it was done before the internal links were done. The phrase "has 25 members of the Queensland Legislative Assembly, the unicameral house of the Parliament of Queensland." is verifiably (notably, too) factual, as visiting the internal links (to official Qld Govt articles) demonstrates.

So how do we cite "The party is currently in opposition" - find the newspaper article that reported that the party lost the election - but they were then 2 separate parties under 2 separate names ... The party IS in opposition precisely BECAUSE another party IS in government - as the official Govt articles state...

If no comments here in a while, I will consider either removing the citation request entirely, or at least moving it to the "The party is currently in opposition" phrase.

FoolesTroupe (talk) 04:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

The tag originally said "fact|now" and I think the objection might have been to the use of the word "currently", which is usually a bad word to use on Wikipedia, or to the inclusion of information which will become out of date. I'll look at rewording it. Peter Ballard (talk) 04:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deputy Leaders

edit

Fiona Simpson has been named as the inaugural deputy leader of the LNP.

Simpson was NEVER the deputy leader and McArdle was the orginal deputy leader back in 2008. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.109.17.24 (talk) 08:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Clive Palmer

edit

How much of a mention should he get in this article? It is obvious he requires at a minimum a sentence or two with the number of WP:RS available, but how much of a mention should he get? Timeshift (talk) 10:24, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

See also: Clive Palmer

edit

It's extremely inappropriate to imply that the LNP has significant links with Mr Palmer in this manner. Having him in the see also section implies that the party is subsidy of his business interests, which is partisan propaganda from political opponents that is contested by the LNP. By all means his link to the party is worth mentioning, but in this manner it's entirely out of proportion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.243.181 (talk) 03:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ideology and political position

edit

Why have political ideology and political position been removed from this article?

Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2015

edit

Please change the spelling of the link to conservatism as it is currently incorrect.

The Liberal National Party (LNP) is a 'consevative' political party in Queensland, Australia.

CustomTomato (talk) 10:38, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Done with thanks, NiciVampireHeart 10:51, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Edit request for misspelling in 7th para in History section

edit

Parliament has been misspelled in para starting "In 1992...".

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liberal National Party of Queensland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why not National Liberal Party?

edit

Why isn't it called the National Liberal Party since the National or the Country Party was the dominant non-Labor party before the merger. 122.106.83.10 (talk) 02:27, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps it's because at a national level there are a lot more Libs than Nats, and the people behind the merger had national goals? HiLo48 (talk) 02:43, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Federally the coalition is called the Liberal-National Coalition, so just calling it the Liberal National Party of Queensland fits it better, and also you could consider it a more liberal National party if you read it that way. Pilot Eighty-Seven (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dutton and Littleproud

edit

@HiLo48: Why are you disputing that this is the first time both Liberal and National leaders are from Queensland at the same time and both had been elected as LNP members? Marcnut1996 (talk) 11:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Because their individual articles don't say that. Littleproud's only mentions the LNP once, in parentheses. Dutton's says a little more, but all the emphasis is that he is part of and leader of the Liberal Party. If all you said was that they are both from Queensland it could be OK, although I'm not sure why we would need that parochialism. Remember that the LNP as a combined party is a specifically Queensland thing, not really known to non-politically minded people outside that state. You need to make things clear to non-Queenslanders (i.e. the rest of the world) how this actually works, probably in Dutton's and Littlepround's own articles. 21:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)