Talk:Liberal internationalism

Untitled

Liberal internationalist theory doesn't revolve around the US, at least not today.

While liberal internationalist theory does not necessarily revolve around the United States, epistemologically it emerged out of American thinking. Secondly, as has been hinted (but not explicitly said in the article) Woodrow Wilson was the first politician to truly act out foreign policy on the grounds of liberal internationalism. Lastly, liberal internationalism relies on the existence of a liberal hegemon in order to enforce the rules of a liberal world order. The depression was caused by a collapse of the liberal economic order, which was due to the apolar nature of global politics of the time. Had the United States been willing to take up its leadership role (as was expected) in the interwar period and become a global creditor, then the effects of the depression would have been lessened. The global leadership requirements of liberal internationalism remain today and are even more important due to the unipolar nature of power with an illiberal China on the rise.Cocacolaisthebest 03:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Makes no sense

Is this article really suggesting that the people listed, like Tony Blair, who supported the war in Iraq also supported the UN and wanted to work through it? The evidence says otherwise. Are they really contrasting these people with "realists" who see the threat of military intervention inevitable? It seems to me that if you take the paragraph describing "realists" at the end, it would make a good description of the people like Blair who are listed as supposedly being the opposite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.57.204 (talk) 17:25, 4 January 2010 (UTC) lol

Democratic party? Are you sure?

Who let the dogs out woof woof woof woof. lol The biggest proponents of intervention to instill liberal values in recent American history have been the neoconservatives, who needless to say are not associated with the Democratic Party (see: Afghanistan and Iraq nation-building efforts). 98.215.87.151 (talk) 22:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Recentism

Have boldly invaded - sorry intervened in this article to combat its blatant recentism and US-centrism. Arguably the policy can be traced back much further than Palmerston, perhaps to Cromwell. Straw Cat (talk) 22:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liberal internationalism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120329133036/http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0605.chotiner.html to http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0605.chotiner.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)