Talk:Liberalization

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Copyright violation

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I reverted this addition because it was a copyright violation, apparently lifted directly from this paper. -- Scjessey (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Prague Spring

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I don't we can use the Prague Spring as an example of the revesral of liberalisation as cited in the text in quotation marks below. If it had been an internal (national) decision to pull the breaks on the process, yes, but that was not the case. The decision to quash the process came from the Soviets, who sent in Warsaw Pact forces. "Liberalization of autocratic regimes may precede democratization (or not, as in the case of the Prague Spring)". Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 11:33, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic