Talk:Liberty 5-3000/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Hydrangeans (talk · contribs) 21:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Kimikel (talk · contribs) 01:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I am going to review this article as part of the October GA backlog drive. I should be done within a week. Kimikel (talk) 01:12, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

@Hydrangeans: Please see below my initial review of this article. I admit there is very little to address, this is a very well-written article. If you have any questions or concerns regarding my suggestions please let me know. Thank you. Kimikel (talk) 02:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

@Kimikel: Thank you for the prompt review and for the generous assessment of the article. I've made the changes you suggested: "starts wanting" now is "wants"; I removed the paragraph about the character's absence from the "2112" adaptation (I had thought Bowman pointing out Liberty 5-3000's absence was of significance but fair enough that the relevance is, ultimately, that the topic is not in that adaptation), and I've added wikilinks for other publishers (ones that remain unlinked are because they apparently do not have articles or redirects). Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 18:02, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

@Hydrangeans: Thank you for your prompt and quality work. This was an excellent article, and there was very little for me to address as a reviewer. I am closing this review as a pass, congratulations! Kimikel (talk) 01:49, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Well-written

Very little to nitpick here.

• "starts wanting" > wants
• "Canadian rock band Rush's 1976 "2112" has lyrics reminiscent of Rand's Anthem, a resemblance lyricist Neil Peart described as having happened accidentally.[56] However, Liberty 5-3000 is "decidedly absent" from the song, musicologist Durrell Bowman explains.[57]" > A song not having any reference to the subject of the article doesn't merit mention; I believe it would be better to remove this paragraph entirely.

Verifiable

• Only one of the publishers is wikilinked in the sources; it'd be nice if they all were for consistency's sake

Spot check

1. 58: Verified
2. 66: Verified
3. 64: Verified
4. 61: Verified
5. 63: Verified

Broad

• Broad in its coverage

Neutral

• Neutral

Illustrated

• Images are properly tagged and contribute to article

Stable

• Stable

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.