Talk:LibreOffice
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LibreOffice article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A summary of this article appears in OpenOffice.org. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
This article contains a translation of LibreOffice from es.wikipedia. |
Infobox only shows "Fresh" release, not "Still"
editThe infobox used to show both "Fresh" (hot off the press) and "Still" (stable, proven) releases - but now it only shows the "Fresh" release version and release date. I peered into the infobox and quickly realized that this is linked to Wikidata and decided to leave this to someone with more experience in Wikidata and linking to Wikipedia.
NeoOffice is inactive, recommends LibreOffice
editNeoOffice just last week declared itself inactive, and recommended users move to LibreOffice, so LO is Neo's designated successor. Patrick Luby is still an LO contributor - anyone want to edit the timeline image accordingly? I guess Neo 22.7 to LO 24.2, or maybe smoothly into the timeline at Dec 2023 - David Gerard (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Release history table seems unnecessary
editThe release history table seems excessively long - it takes up nearly half the total vertical height of the article, and it seems to violate WP:NOTCHANGELOG. I'm not sure what the best practices are for removing sections like that which is why I haven't done it myself, but I wanted to draw attention to it at least. 64.67.144.111 (talk) 22:10, 13 October 2024 (UTC)