Talk:LibreOffice

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 64.67.144.111 in topic Release history table seems unnecessary

Infobox only shows "Fresh" release, not "Still"

edit

The infobox used to show both "Fresh" (hot off the press) and "Still" (stable, proven) releases - but now it only shows the "Fresh" release version and release date. I peered into the infobox and quickly realized that this is linked to Wikidata and decided to leave this to someone with more experience in Wikidata and linking to Wikipedia.

Enquire (talk) 00:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

NeoOffice is inactive, recommends LibreOffice

edit

NeoOffice just last week declared itself inactive, and recommended users move to LibreOffice, so LO is Neo's designated successor. Patrick Luby is still an LO contributor - anyone want to edit the timeline image accordingly? I guess Neo 22.7 to LO 24.2, or maybe smoothly into the timeline at Dec 2023 - David Gerard (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Release history table seems unnecessary

edit

The release history table seems excessively long - it takes up nearly half the total vertical height of the article, and it seems to violate WP:NOTCHANGELOG. I'm not sure what the best practices are for removing sections like that which is why I haven't done it myself, but I wanted to draw attention to it at least. 64.67.144.111 (talk) 22:10, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply