Talk:Life in the United Kingdom test

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Answers

edit

Anyone fancy publishing the answers? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.85.13.68 (talkcontribs) 16:58, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

That's not really going to help, since this scam of a test consists primarily of irrelevant numerical questions. All the numbers come up in the official study guide. It's a matter of remembering them: no separate list of answers is going to be any better. By the way, the test has absolutely nothing to do with "becoming British", and would be failed by almost any native British citizen who didn't study the book. --82.6.105.198 (talk) 15:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Answers

edit

The Guardian article only lists questions, not answers, and the Wikipedians who took it upon themselves to answer them need to be a little more careful.

When was Britain last invaded?

This depends on one's definition of both "Britain" and "invasion". For instance, while the Glorious Revolution is frequently called a "Bloodless Revolution", it nevertheless saw some actual fighting between William and Mary's Dutch-raised army and "British" forces. The Raid on the Medway might also very well be defined as an "invasion". 1216? Prince Louis took Winchester, was crowned and controlled almost half of England at one point. That seems fairly invasion-like to me. If they mean 'successfully' invaded, then I'd stick with 1688. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlieRCD (talkcontribs) 10:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Channel Islands? Or do they mean mainland Britain? Ddawkins73 (talk) 19:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh, succesfully invaded, mainland Britain - that's easy: Australia invaded. Main HQ is West London. They control all the beer and you have to pay them for it now. Ddawkins73 (talk) 19:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Huge Wave of support

edit

"Fact: Mary defeated Lady Jane Grey's bid to usurp the throne with a huge wave of English support" that seems a somewhat simplistic take on it and I do not believe "huge wave" is a particularily encyclopediac term, there were many who supported Jane and some would even disagree that she sought to usurp the throne (although as I understand that is a minority opinion) either way I feel that something to the effect of Mary having not had Spanish aid in gaining the throne would be better than the current version. Jamhaw (talk) 20:47, 26 October 2009 (UTC)jamhawReply

Update template

edit

Just to say that I placed the update template on this article because at the moment it makes no reference to the new, current third edition of the handbook and test. It'd be good if someone with knowledge of this subject could help by adding such information.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordrosemount (talkcontribs) 13:55, 5 July 2013‎

Given that a third edition is now mentioned, I've removed this template. --McGeddon (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Life in the United Kingdom test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply