Talk:Liftboat

Plagarism: Violation of copyright / promotion by liftboat company

This article on liftboats appears to have been plagarised from http://www.levingstonoffshore.com/whatisaliftboat/ , a website of a boatbuilding company specialising in liftboats. The edits appear to have been made by http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Levingstonoffshore (blocked for conflict of interest) and http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Elijahzane (blocked as suspected sockpuppet of Levingstonoffshore)

I've never edited for advert or plagarised content before, apologies if I've done it incorrectly. Comrade jo (talk) 16:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.levingstonoffshore.com/whatisaliftboat/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MLauba ^(Talk) 07:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Issue: advertisement

Hi all,

New to editing Wikipedia, but two of the sections of this page are just blatant advertisements for specific boats which are not particularly important to the industry, and I think they should be removed.

HesteaAndaridda (talk) 20:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Seacor Power section needs work

Seacor power section provides details that do not have proper sourcing, and are also likely incorrect. Specifically the mention of "The vessel capsized after an unnamed category 1 hurricane raised 70 to 80 mph (110 to 130 km/h) winds and rough seas" is not sourced and does not appear to be correct based upon information available from definitive sources. This information also differs from the main Seacor Power wiki article. --W Scott Lincoln 14:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)