Talk:Lighthouse paradox

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 8 April 2016 by reviewer 333-blue (talk · contribs).

Reliable source?

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I’d like to help improve this article because it really has quite a few issues, but I think it might not be proper for me to edit it. One issue that’s already tagged is that most of it seems to be original research. And that’s why I shouldn’t be the person to fix it. Not that I don’t have (dubious?) cites, it’s that I’m the originator of the thought experiment the article describes.

https://boards.straightdope.com/t/information-faster-than-light/38288/20

Unfortunately, despite dating to before the existence of Wikipedia, I don’t think it qualifies as a reliable source. Anybody else have a differing opinion? jam (talk) 07:43, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

(I have added a section header - see wp:Talk page formatting. Hope you don't mind.)

No, indeed, that probably is an example of the least possible reliable source

.

There's some good sources out there. Perhaps they can help improve the article. Are there some specific parts that are unsourced or poorly sourced, that you suspect are original research? - DVdm (talk) 09:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic