Talk:Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song)

Requested move 2 April 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 10:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

---

Like That (Future and Metro Boomin song) → Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song) – Kendrick Lamar is credited as a main artist on the song, so his name should be in the disambiguator. Source: https://music.apple.com/us/album/like-that/1737149923?i=1737150439+98.6.144.50 (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – robertsky (talk) 14:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Most sources list him as a feature. More citations needed. 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

@162 etc.: here are some more sources of him being credited as a main artist: https://open.spotify.com/track/2tudvzsrR56uom6smgOcSf?si=90vqYEc1Rimvw6wVhBKraA&context=spotify%3Aplaylist%3A37i9dQZF1DX0XUsuxWHRQd, https://tidal.com/track/352641780 (you can look at the album here to see for track 6), and even the YouTube channel of one of the artists of the song himself: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N9bKBAA22Go. Thank you. 98.6.144.50 (talk) 23:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

What i can see is the album artist is Future and Metro Boomin and the other artists are simply guest credits, if you see the lead of the album We Don't Trust You this is what is said and therefore i believe the artist Kendrick Lamar is not required to be in the title as long as this is correct some of the sources i can't read all without subscribtion. DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 15:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Apple Music US has Kendrick and the other artists on the album listed as primary, not features... https://music.apple.com/us/album/we-dont-trust-you/1737149923 KaylenBrown (talk) 23:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

So guests are not treated the same as featuring,also here Future and Metro Boomin are mentioned as a Duo https://variety.com/2024/music/news/future-metro-boomin-collaborative-albums-we-dont-trust-you-1235935712/ so wouldn't it be (Future & Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song) like Macklemore & Ryan Lewis. DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

• Support It does appear that more recent sources, including the Billboard chart[1], do not use the "feature" wording. 162 etc. (talk) 16:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support Sources seem to indicate consensus that Lamar is a main artist, with Billboard as well as Complex[2]. ThatSourPatchKid 19:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support Per 162 etc. and ThatSourPatchKid. JeffSpaceman (talk) 15:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
• Support Lamar is not a feature but a main artist in this case. Ippantekina (talk) 03:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: LunaEclipse (talk · contribs) 12:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Hi, @LunaEclipse. I think I'll be reviewing the article at the end of the month, although I want that to happen sooner. My apologies for that. Best, Santi (talk) 02:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Pollosito, take your time, I won't mind at all. — 🌙Eclipse ^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Lead

• I suggest you move the present source to the body of the article. Refs in this section only apply if it's too short or one paragraph long. Santi (talk) 14:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done 🌙Eclipse ^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

• As "Wilburn Holding Co." isn't an alternative name for the song, please remove bold text. Santi (talk) 04:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Background

• It seems absurdly short to me. Could you put information about the album it belongs to? In articles about songs they usually do that. Santi (talk) 13:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
  • Done. 🌙Eclipse ^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
• The ref 2 doesn't mention that "First Person Shooter" is part of For All the Dogs. Although I know it is out of a sense of logic, at least I would prefer to verify those specific details. Santi (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done 🌙Eclipse ^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

• Record producer Metro Boomin announced a collaborative album with rapper Future in an interview by Flaunt Magazine, set to release in 2023. He had saved a few tracks he produced for the latter for the album. First, I see in the reference that it says only "collaboration", not "collaborative album". Second, I don't see any mention of saved tracks, or I got lost from reading so much (I almost fell asleep, in fact, I'm not in my season of wanting to read LOL). Santi (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

 Done 🌙Eclipse ^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

• @Pollosito: I have addressed your comments, you may continue with the review. lunaeclipse ^(talk) 20:25, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

  @LunaEclipse: Thank you for remembering. I will address the article at the same time as the other one I am reviewing, but not today, because I am on my cell phone, and it is hard for me to manage Wikipedia with that and that is why I hate it. Santi (talk) 22:27, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

• Is there a better reference to confirm the trailer other than the trailer itself? Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Done lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
• It would be a good idea to put information about the tracklist and what position it was there. Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  In progress lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
• Archiving mising: ref 1, 4, 5, 6 and 8. Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Done lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
• Pipe Revolt to Revolt (TV network). Santi (talk) 02:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  •  Done lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

@Pollosito: I apologize for not addressing these earlier. Was busy reading Homestuck. lunaeclipse ^(talk) 23:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

@LunaEclipse: No problem. I'm also busy, but in finishing high school and in this FAC LOL. Santi (talk) 23:43, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Comments

• @LunaEclipse: I believe in you. However, this article really has many problems with original research covered by a misleading prose. Sorry, but I don't think it should be a good item under the state it is in. I prefer to give you a month to base yourself on other new GAs to improve this one, and then you ping me and we continue with the review. Santi (talk) 03:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Pollosito, shouldn't you fail the nom then? — lunaeclipse ^(talk) 01:58, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

    @LunaEclipse: I think so, only if you're not available to fix in the way mentioned above. I don't want to do that, but, if it's the best decision... Santi (talk) 05:04, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

    @LunaEclipse: Seriously I don't want to do this, but since neither the reviewer nor the nominator apparently are interested in working on this, I'll close the review as  Failed. Santi (talk) 23:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)