Talk:Likelihoodist statistics
Latest comment: 5 years ago by SolidPhase in topic Rohde (2014)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Rohde (2014)
editRohde (2014) is on topic for this article, but the quality of the book seems low to me. Do readers benefit from being pointed to it? SolidPhase (talk) 11:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- @SolidPhase Agree that it's not a very sophisticated book, but it seems useful: there aren't many likelihoodist textbooks (with your help, there are 4 listed), and so we'd at least want a short "Textbooks" subsection, so including it there and noting in the prose isn't excessive.
- Thanks for adding more references (and cleaning them up!); Pawitan (2001) was the main one I'd been aware of, and Rodhe (2014) came up a few places too.
- —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 17:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sure—that makes sense. I am very much glad that this article has been created. SolidPhase (talk) 20:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)