Talk:Lilith (magazine)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Judaism Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish Women Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Two different magazines?

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is this the same magazine as the anarchao-feminist seattle-based paper that created the famous "Lilths manifesto"? At Swedish wikipedia there is an article about that paper, but i don't really know if they are the same. The magazine refered to in the swedish article has been distributed since 1969, the magazine in the english article has been published quarterly since 1976, but it does not really say when it was first created. It would be good to know so that a correct interwiki can be crated. Muneyama 14:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I looked up the Women's Majority Uniuon and the "Lilith Manifresto" and it seems that it is a different paper: https://www.historylink.org/File/2321 https://historylink.org/File/2320 and according to this source, they ran out of funds to continue publication after 1971: https://www.bolerium.com/pages/books/285619/lilith-unnumbered-final-issue ~~~~ Katja0610 (talk) 06:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Headquarters in NYC, not Seattle

Lilith Magazine is definitely not Seattle-based. My aunt, Susan Weidman-Schneider is the founder and editor and her offices have been in New York since the magazine started decades ago. Sydneyw 23:54, 21 May 2006 (Central Time)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lilithcover.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image:Lilithcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lilith (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic