Talk:Lilou Macé
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2A00:C88:4000:A004:4193:7E2F:60E2:720D in topic PROD
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
PROD
editI have canceled the WP:PROD on this article. Here are a couple other sources that help establish notability: [1], [2] ~Kvng (talk) 14:19, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- She barely meets WP:BASIC for the french edition of Wikipedia and most certainly not this one: "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:C88:4000:A004:4193:7E2F:60E2:720D (talk) 13:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
How is she notable and isn't Wikipedia articles supposed to have sources?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.160.236.29 (talk) 21:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- Why are proposals for deletion always deleted without discussion? Pathetic! She's a nobody — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:C88:4000:A004:4483:6C7E:5019:8B77 (talk) 12:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)