Talk:Lime (color)

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Andrybak in topic Main image


Untitled

edit

Anyone have any opinions on whether this article should be here or at Lime (color)?? Georgia guy 23:54, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Anyone notice this??

edit

Here's an interesting thing about Wikipedia's color sequence:

Red-Scarlet-Vermillon-Orange-Amber-Tangerine-Gold-Yellow-Lime-Chartreuse-Green-Spring_green-Cyan-Azure-Blue-Persian_blue-Violet

The colors in the range from scarlet to gold look sort-of-orange when I view the screen with my eyes on the bottom of the computer, but sort-of-yellow-green when my eyes are towards the top, and the exact opposite is true of lime. Georgia guy 23:16, 29 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

And what else?? When I look at spring green, it looks sort-of-sky-blue towards the top. Georgia guy 23:19, 29 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

And when I look at Persian blue, it looks somewhat redder than violet when my eye goes towards the top. Isn't all this funny?? Georgia guy 23:21, 29 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

And still one more thing: when I look at the color circle about saturation, it looks black when I view it with my eye at the bottom, and white when my eye is towards the top. Georgia guy 22:25, 30 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Some LCD flat screen monitors display the effect of apparent color change depending on viewing angle, with viewing it from higher or lower angles most strongly effecting those changes. CRT monitors generally never have that problem. If you really want to see a full blooming of that problem, tilt your LCD viewing of an RGB gamut map, like one here [1] or one there [2]. Study LCD light polarization and RGB gamut articles for further details. Samuel Erau (talk) 04:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Main image

edit

We should change the main picture of infobox. --Extra999 (talk) 14:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The image File:Limes.jpg was replaced by a montage in Special:Diff/1039802181. —⁠andrybak (talk) 22:37, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Multiple "Lime" pages

edit

Some of the (current) items listed in the section "Lime in human culture" seem more appropriate for one or more of the other "Lime" pages; for example, the item on "Limey" is a reference to Lime (fruit) rather than Lime (color). 206.205.52.162 (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

I removed three items for that reason. Rojomoke (talk) 06:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lime (color). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lemon Lime

edit

The section states that this is a color named after certain carbonated soft drinks. The text in the section contains no references. The color coordinates template has a place for a source but that field doesn't have a proper reference, simply the word "Sprite".

Searching for Sprite leads one to one possible website: Sprite. That site does make reference to "lemon-lime", but in context it is clearly a reference to a flavor not a color. That particular website gives no hint that there is a color by this name and certainly not any information on the color attributes.

I don't plan to edit this article as my current focus is on the color lists articles (e.g. List_of_colors:_A–F). I do plan to remove this entry from that list, but if someone does some research and can can find evidence that there is a color by this name, it can be restored.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply