- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Lin Qi (businessman). No consensus at this point on whether the businessman is the primary topic. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Lin Qi (entrepreneur) → Lin Qi – WP:PTOPIC by page views as well as by Google Trends, and searching for just the name provides more results for this page's subject. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 00:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Agree with changing "entrepreneur" to "businessman". — BarrelProof (talk) 00:01, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Move to Lin Qi (businessman). This article was created less than four months ago on 29 March 2024. I think if we let the dab page sit, we can gather some more information on clickthrough data. Furthermore, I think long-term significance ought to be considered, which may become clearer as time passes. FWIW, in May 2024, 423 people visited the dab, 255 went to the businessman, 21 to Yoozoo Games, 12 to the ancient politician, and the rest unaccounted for. June saw 87 incoming views, 56 to the businessman, and the rest unaccounted for. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 04:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Relisting comment: Thoughts on moving to Lin Qi (businessman)? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Support per nomination and Crouch, Swale, paired with Lin Qi → deleted to make room for move, per WP:ONEOTHER. Alternatively, would not oppose retaining the two-man disambiguation page and moving Lin Qi (entrepreneur) → Lin Qi (businessman), per Necrothesp and Rotideypoc41352. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 02:31, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Move to Lin Qi (businessman). I agree with the suggestion of considering the long-term significance aspect of the primary topic criteria. I also don't think Google trends results are worth taking into account for usage per the concerns above about recentism. Egsan Bacon (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
