Talk:Lincoln Aviator

Land Rover?

The infobox says that the Aviator is related to the Land Rover Discovery/LR3. As far as I know, no Land Rovers use the same platform as the Explorer/Mountaineer/Aviator, but I just want to make sure I'm correct. Is it okay to remove the Land Rovers from the infobox? —Reelcheeper (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

i work for land rover so its okay but it will mess your countrols up and mess the electric system. p.s just buy one because there cheap these days. Tyler — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.148.53.200 (talk) 14:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

The relationship between the two models is a not hard to figure if you have ever seen them side by side in a wrecking yard and been underneath the two models in a service shop and then there are all the common parts. < Moss 460*8 > — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.195.117.244 (talk) 02:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lincoln Aviator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090212180838/http://media.ford.com/article_download.cfm?article_id=27379 to http://media.ford.com/article_download.cfm?article_id=27379
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091019011138/http://media.ford.com/press_kits.cfm?presskit_id=1111 to http://media.ford.com/press_kits.cfm?presskit_id=1111

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Crossover?

If the new 2020 Aviator shares the same platform as the new Ford Explorer, and the Explorer is now considered an SUV, why is the new Aviator considered a crossover instead? I know some media sources such as Autoblog call it a crossover, but Lincoln themselves call it an SUV. --Vossanova ^o< 15:02, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

No, it's not a CUV While the use of unibody construction alone does not denote the 2020 Explorer/Aviator as a crossover (the Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ and Range Rover are definitely NOT CUVs...), supposedly its CD6 architecture will be utilized for both cars and SUVs in the future. In addition, in terms of its price and seating, the Aviator is closely matching the soon-to-be-discontinued MKT, which the Aviator is NOT directly replacing (mentioned by both Lincoln and source used on in this article). I consider the naming of it as an SUV as not inaccurate and should be used for the article. --SteveCof00 (talk) 08:08, 7 May 2019 (UTC)