Talk:Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Suggested edits so this article doesn't read like an advertisement

edit

This article has been flagged (by @HapHaxion I believe) for containing content that is written like an advertisement. I work for the Lincoln Institute and will therefore not edit the page directly, but I would suggest tweaking the introductory section so that it doesn't as closely resemble the organization's website. The Lincoln Institute is a nonprofit think tank based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, that works on issues related to land use, land based financing, and land conservation. There are plenty of external sources to cite in relation to various aspects of the institute's work. The following are just a few examples. I'd be happy to answer questions.

https://www.governing.com/finance/controversial-tool-helping-fund-chicagos-long-awaited-rail-extension

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/23/business/next-30-days-could-help-decide-future-development-near-public-transit-massachusetts/

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/18/realestate/home-buyer-risks-bad-credit-savings.html

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/12/upshot/cities-grew-safer-police-budgets-kept-growing.html

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/12/upshot/cities-grew-safer-police-budgets-kept-growing.html

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2022/3/22/cambridge-forum-danielle-allen/ Cornerstone2898 (talk) 21:00, 19 September 2022 (UTC)Reply