Talk:Linda Cardellini/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Linda Cardellini. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Italian/Irish heritage

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed this info because I couldn't find a good source for it (i.e. IMDB, copies of Wikipedia, etc. don't count...) Has anyone seen one? JackO'Lantern 18:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

maybe you should of requested a citation first, before deleting... [1]

Her mother is Irish and her father is Italian. I suppose this means she is Irish and Italian. The name is spelled Cardellini

Cadellini?

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The body lists her father's last name as "Cardellini" as you'd expect, but the info box says her birth name was "Cadellini." Just a typo, right? 69.140.178.221 08:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

A typo of course!User:Trampton

WikiProject class rating

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 08:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Sources for disputed content

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In this edit, an IP user reinserted a claim about Cardellini in an animated TV show. Since it's been challenged, what reliable source backs this up? (And don't say IMDb, please). --Lexein (talk) 12:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Photographs - taken on a potato?

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The two images below the prime image of this article are so low resolution they should be removed from the article. They're worthless, the person depicted is near unidentifiable in one of them. It's 2012, the average person has 3.8 digital cameras in the home with an average quality exceeding 8 megapixel. One of the images is 0.0034 megapixel. The publisher of it should be ashamed of themselves for contributing such utter rubbish. This kind of stuff is infuriating and inexcusable to any fan of photography, yet unfortunately prevalent as all hell on Wikipedia.

I understand they probably think they're helping, but so do dolts who add incoherent illiterate paragraphs that make no sense to articles which we all just have to clean up. In this case though, because it is a photograph and not babbling drivel in text, it seems to get a free pass? I disagree. In fact, I'm going to be bold and just fucken remove them. If you want to see how horrible they were if you're reading this and hadn't seen them before hand, the worst offender is File:PaleyFest_2011_-_Freaks_and_Geeks_Reunion_-_the_cast.jpg, and the other is File:Linda_Cardellini_onstage.jpg. I'll make a note on the user page of the person who took the photos thanking them for their contribution but politely asking that they try and ensure future uploads are at least 72 dpi (the first one I'd estimate to be about 30 or less. It displays less pixelated at 8% of it's size when played with in photoshop.

I hope I offend no one in this little rant, but as an artsy type I just nerdrage when I see such an affront to quality. As I said, if it was low quality textual content being contributed, it'd be reverted instantly and the persons talk page would get a vandalism warning. :P BaSH PR0MPT (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. See WP:TIGERS. All rants, and nerdrage, belong off Wikipedia. WP:Images are desirable in articles, and while high quality is preferred, representative imagery of a living person's work and appearances is acceptable even if it does not meet arbitrarily high, personal, and undocumented, standards. Yes, some images are unacceptable, such as when they are obviously too blurry in their unzoomed state, but the images you deleted do not fall into that class of low quality. Your tactic of blowing up the images beyond their in-article size is WP:POINTy, blatantly uncooperative behavior, and ignorant of the conditions under which the photos were taken, and the fact that Wikipedia depends upon and requires images to be licensed under free terms; this reduces the catalog of available images tremendously. Seems like you didn't thank any of the "authors" of the images, since in both cases, the editor who added the image to the article was me, not the original photo creator. Further, I requested the original photographers to license those images as CC, and spent a good little bit of time to improve the images to a level of acceptable usability here. You are the very first editor to comment so negatively, and delete so decisively, those images. Wikipedia is not a place upon which to visit one's personal biases, without actual discussion and consensus with other editors. So, per WP:BRD, you boldly deleted, I reverted, so now we, and others, discuss. --Lexein (talk) 07:22, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't think either photo is overly bad. The PaleyFest one is rather blurry, which isn't too noticeable in its reduced state in the article. The onstage one is kind of grainy but bearable. I don't think that low quality is a good reason to exclude these images. It is a rare enough thing at Wikipedia that we have images of an acceptable license for living people that are not obstructed or otherwise unacceptable. I think we should take the opportunity to illustrate the article for now, and use this as a chance to appeal to fans for better quality images with a license we can use. Elizium23 (talk) 07:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Boy Meets World edit revert war

Latest comment: 11 years ago9 comments4 people in discussion

Please stop edit warring over "Boy Meets World" roles that Cardellini may have played, but please provide a reliable source. If such a source does not exist, delete the role not sourced. --Lexein (talk) 11:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Well, my edit was a mistake. Somehow I thought that the previous edit was adding it, and I thought I was reverting that (removing it), but it was the opposite. Sorry. User:Sofffie7 is the one who added it. Maybe she'll add a reference or explain here. --Musdan77 (talk) 05:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Clearly you both haven't looked separately at every recent edit from the history... Because if you had you would have noticed that I just added stuff on her ancestry, her siblings and her parents' jobs and that it's actually an IP who added 'Stacey' next to Lauren. --Sofffie7 (talk) 13:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

She never guest starred as a "Stacey" on Boy Meets World. She only played a character named Lauren, I should know, I have seen all of her episodes on the show. This edit war is completely nonsensical. QuasyBoy (talk) 23:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

It's not a big deal. I'm glad the article is being developed, with sources. Let's just keep in mind this is a WP:BLP, so only add sourced claims. "I should know" - hee! --Lexein (talk) 00:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Addendum - Just checked IMDb and several other online sources. Cardellini only played Lauren, so "Stacey" is out. --Lexein (talk) 01:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps me saying "I should know" was pushing it, but as it turns out I was correct. QuasyBoy (talk) 04:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Can we call this consensus, that Lauren was her only BMW role, and close this? Yes/No/Comment below... --Lexein (talk) 14:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes --Lexein (talk) 14:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Yes. There really was no warring per se; just basically some mix-ups, and maybe some feathers ruffled. -- A learning experience. --Musdan77 (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Marriage Information

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The side bar says "Partner(s): Steven Rodriguez (2009-present; engaged since 2013)". Surely that is supposed to be the other way 'round? married 2013, engaged 2009? 108.181.155.99 (talk) 00:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Lost in Austin

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Any info on this project? Was it killed? http://variety.com/2014/film/news/linda-cardellini-jason-lee-craig-robinson-heading-for-lost-in-austin-exclusive-1201059890/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.91.188.153 (talk) 22:40, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Linda Cardellini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linda Cardellini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716050132/http://sfsketchfest.com/performers/ to http://www.sfsketchfest.com/performers/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

DOB

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Folks, please don't add her date of birth yet again unless it's backed by a WP:RS. Please keep WP:IMDBREF in mind. Toddst1 (talk) 03:38, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Daughter's name

Latest comment: 7 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

@MadBlade 2: let’s ignore the other stuff. I see no reason to go against WP:BLPNAME. Thedarkknightli (talk) 19:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Yeah definitely, but I really think her daughters name should stay because most Wikipedia pages of actors and actresses, have their names of their child in the personal life section. So I think it's should stay, I stop fighting it, only if you let it stay, because I don't want to get into another argument, I've done it before with other uses on Wikipedia, but I don't want to start another one now. I would appreciate if you would let it stay. Please and thank you. MadBlade 2 (talk) 11:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

You aren't hearing me, buddy. As I mentioned in my last comment here, other stuff should generally be ignored, and I don't see why Cardellini should be an exception. Kindly refrain from assuming article ownership. Thedarkknightli (talk) 11:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I didn't say that Cardellini should be an exception (Not because she is an actress I'm becoming a fan of), or assuming I own the article, I'm just stating the fact that the name of her child should be in the personal life section. Yes I understand why you think it should be an exception, but I'm just stating a fact that her child's name should be on the article like other Wikipedia has on actors like the late Burt Reynolds, or his ex-girlfriend actress Sally field, etc. I really don't want to get into another fight on here over something, I have done it before with other users and I have either won or lost, for example, I tried to add the Hollywood release date for the live-action Scooby-Doo movie that Cardellini was in, but a user by the name of MikeAllen tried to tell me that I need a reliable source even though it came out in Hollywood on June 8th of 2002. I apologize if it's not a good example, but I don't want to start another argument. I hope you understand. Please and thank you. MadBlade 2 (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)