Talk:Lindor

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Gh5046 in topic Merge?

Ingredients by flavour

edit

I believe we should remove that section of the article, since it really is useless. It tells nothing of the chocolate, and really, no one is going to care for it. --Steven 00:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

... However, if we turned the prose flavor list into a table or bulleted list, with the color of the wrapping matched to the flavor, that would be useful. --BlueNight 17:28, 21 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
well now that we have a table, the paragraph that follows is unnecessary75.45.184.228 (talk) 03:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge?

edit

I'm getting confused now. Isn't Lindor the product of Lindt? Can't we merge these two pages? Applejaxs 21:19, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Absolutely agree with you. Besides the fact that many parts of both articles are totally useless (ingredients, different flavours of ice cream...), they both relate to the same brand, and are both relatively minor articles. Why sould there be a special page about Lindor? Is it that special? Dmontin 18:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
I agree as well. Most of this information is already in the Lindt & Sprüngli article. I'll copy over anything notable that isn't already there, and will redirect this page. Gh5046 (talk) 23:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Merge is complete. Gh5046 (talk) 21:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

liquid?

edit

i don't think the filling is meant to be liquid. whenever i eat it it's solid

The chocolate inside is a liquid at room temperature, it melts at a lower point than the shell. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.10.232.131 (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is meant to be a liquidishy.....like a soft chocolate/truffle like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.219.251 (talk) 11:54, 18 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Agree that page should be added to main Lindt article. Feel it forms more of a sub-heading to the main article than a seperate subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennett.wm (talkcontribs) 13:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply