 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Citation style
editI really don't see the rationale for changing the citation style from sfn to in-line. Sfn is a perfectly legitimate style, when used with a bibliography. Now we have a hybrid. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- I only see two citations. None of the bibliography is cited. I'm not a stickler meeseeks, but seems that a bibliography is for general information used in a work, and the citations are to note sources of specific facts or quotes. Personally I like being able to check a specific source relating to a specific sentence, but others like poring over many sources. I don't see an issue with a chimera.Nessie (talk) 15:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)