Talk:Line 19 (Wuhan Metro)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:54, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the opening date of Line 19 of the Wuhan Metro was announced on the day before? Source: https://news.cjn.cn/whpd/yw_19947/202312/t4784783.htm (武汉轨道交通19号线和5号线二期将于2023年12月30日开通初期运营。19号线开通时间为上午10时28... Translation: Wuhan Metro Line 19 and Line 5 second phase will be put into initial operations on December 30, 2023. Line 19 opens at 10:28 a.m. ...)
  • ALT1: ... that Line 19 of the Wuhan Metro will become the "fastest" line within the network? Source: http://news.cnhubei.com/content/2022-12/15/content_15319120.html (设计最高运行速度初期为120公里/小时，预留提升至140公里/小时的条件，是武汉市“跑得最快”的地铁。 Translation: The designed maximum operating speed is initially 120 km/h, with conditions reserved for raising it to 140 km/h. It is the "fastest" subway [line] in Wuhan.)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Line 51 (Amsterdam Metro)

Moved to mainspace by S5A-0043 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Line 19 (Wuhan Metro); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• Article is good; long enough, new enough, no copyvio, good prose, proper refers. QPQ done. I like the main hook more than I like the ALT1. ALT1 lacks context I think; I don't know how fast the other lines are so it's hard to judge how impressive this is. Maybe needs a reword to emphasize speed. For the main hook, my concern is the wording implies there was no knowledge about when the line would open until a day before the opening, but the sources don't seem to support that. Both seem to suggest an announcement the day prior, but maybe they're just repeating claims that they had made previously about the opening date. E.g. they announced the opening date multiple times before, and made a last confirmation announcement a day before. To be clear, I trust that you're probably right but just need clearer confirmation from a source. toobigtokale (talk) 03:19, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

• Toobigtokale actually I feel I kind of not thought through & jumped the gun on this nomination, and (slightly embarrassingly) regretted this nomination the week after I made it but forgot to comment here. I thought over it and both hooks aren't exactly good. Hence I'd like to withdraw this nomination. Thank you for the review nonetheless and apologies. S5A-0043^Talk 14:31, 3 February 2024 (UTC)