Talk:Line 4 (Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 3 October 2023
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Línea 4 del Tren Eléctrico Urbano de Guadalajara from es.wikipedia. (1094648689 et seq.) |
Requested move 3 October 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Line 4 (Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano). Consensus has coalesced around this alternative and it matches the recent moves of lines 1–3. (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:47, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Line 4 of the Guadalajara urban rail system → Line 3, Guadalajara Urban Electric Train System – Clarity NorthWestPianoShrimp319 (talk) 12:18, 3 October 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- I cannot close this as move as there is no rationale given in terms of WP:NC. — Relisting. Andrewa (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Move to Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano (Line 4). The name of the article on the system is Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano. See Talk:Line 1 of the Guadalajara urban rail system#Requested move 3 October 2023. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:16, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with this, as it is the naming scheme that has been adopted for the articles on lines 1, 2 and 3. On the closure notice in the talk page for the article on line 3, there is rationale given in terms of various policies. NorthWestPianoShrimp319 (talk) 23:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- I recall the naming was the opposite. It should be Line 4 (Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano). SistemaRayoXP (talk) 23:33, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- If that is how all the other lines' articles have been renamed, then I support this. NorthWestPianoShrimp319 (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, that is actually correct. I support this alternative. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:24, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.