 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Lingotto was copied or moved into Lingotto (neighbourhood) with this edit on 22:53, 02 May 2024. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Dead links
editThere are many dead links — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.237.213.234 (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Which do you mean? There are two links in references, neither of which seem dead to me. Mark in wiki (talk) 20:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe the IP user is talking about wp:red links. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:08, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lingotto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927200307/http://www.focchi.it/projects/lingotto-exhibition-center/ to http://www.focchi.it/projects/lingotto-exhibition-center/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lingotto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070126110909/http://www.fotogian.com/oval.html to http://www.fotogian.com/oval.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Split Proposal
editI propose the article be Split into Lingotto (district) referring to the geographical area within Turin, and Lingotto (building), referring to the multipurpose building in Via Nizza, as the two are completely separate topics. The introduction of this article makes it seem as if the article is about both, which is really confusing, specially when it's mostly about the building.
Thanks Milo8505 (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Milo8505: I agree that the current situation is very confusing, and that it should definitely be tidied. However, the article is already light on reliable sources as is. Do you have sources in mind that could be used to sustain both an article about the Turino district separate from the building, and an article on the building only?
- The alternative would be to remodel the current content about the building into a section on the building and then try to expand remaining sections of the article with content on the Turino district. Felix QW (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Milo8505: I agree they should be split, as they are quite different topics, but am a bit concerned that would leave two very short articles. Provided that you are comfortable that over time the articles will grow, I'd go ahead and do it. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 08:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- I completed the split as the topics are very distinct and there is plenty of material to translate from their corresponding Italian articles. – BrandonXLF (talk) 22:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)