Talk:Lion Throne of Burma

Myanmar Low‑importance

Lion Throne of Burma is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

Requested move 26 October 2019

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move, exactly where is a matter of deduction. (1) There is clear consensus and policy-based reasoning to remove "the" from the title. (2) There is also consensus to disambiguate using the name of the country at the time, which is Myanmar, not Burma. However there is no consensus on whether to use natural disambiguation or parenthetical disambiguation for the country. Given the consensus on points (1) and (2), the title we are left with is Lion Throne of Burma. As there is no consensus on whether to use Lion Throne of Burma or Lion Throne (Burma), the status quo has been preserved and the article has been moved to the former. This is without prejudice against speedy renomination to gain consensus on natural or parenthetical disambiguation, or Netoholic's alternative proposal. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 10:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The Lion Throne of Myanmar → Lion Throne (Myanmar) – proper naming format Gryffindor (talk) 19:48, 26 October 2019 (UTC) —Relisting. SITH (talk) 15:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'm partial to the current natural disambiguation, though I agree that phrase is not commonly used. I'd propose move to Sihasana as a better alternative. -- Netoholic @ 20:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Comment. Whatever happens, per WP:THE the definite article should be removed. I would also note that given the country was always known as Burma when the throne was in use, any disambiguator should be Burma and not Myanmar. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:08, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Comment. I fully agree with calling the country at that time Burma. But The Lion Throne seems to me more common, as most people and also the National Museum in their leaflet call it The Lion Throne. Munfarid1 09:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC) Munfarid1 09:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC) Munfarid1 (talk • contribs)
- No source I can find capitalises "the" in running text, so per WP:THE we shouldn't include it in the title. Just being referred to as "the Lion Throne" (of course it is) doesn't mean we should include the definite article in the title. Most things are; most Wikipedia articles do not. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:50, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic