| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liquid-ring pump article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Title
editShouldn't the title of the page rather be "Liquid ring pump"? That's what I searched for, but the article doesn't come up if you type it into the search box. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.203.21.99 (talk) 19:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
- I agree and I have changed it. Biscuittin (talk) 23:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Environmental Issues
editDear writer,
your article was very clear to me, so first of all I would like to thank you for your time and effort you have put in making this article. One remark stays unclear though: "Environmental considerations are making such once through systems increasingly rare." I was wondering if you could explain this a bit more, or mention a reference with more information about environmental issues. Thank you. Tristan Groot 11:10, 23 July 2007 (The Netherlands)
- I didn't write that section, but I can answer that question. A typical industrial sized vacuum pump uses fresh water measured in Mega-litres per month, not litres. You can imagine there are fewer and fewer places in the world where a plant can justify pouring megalitres of fresh water down the drain, or even feeding it into downstream process, rather than recirculating and recycling the water. Bernard S. Jansen 05:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)