Talk:Liquidated damages

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Some discussion of unlawful bank charges and a link to the Bank Action Group would be useful in this article - I'll add them in soon.

No they wouldn't. The example already contained in the article more than adequately explains the concept. 81.132.24.17 19:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Also, it's disputed whether bank charges are damages for a breach of contract or simply a contractual payment following a trigger event. 194.131.14.2 18:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Is a "stipulated damage clause" the same as a "liquidated damage clause" in a contract? Skeeter08865 05:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Liquidated damages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply