Talk:Lisbon Ripper
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Definition?
editDon't you need to say what "ripped" means? Do you mean slashed w/ a knife?
- I agree, the term needs to be defined, linked, or substituted by more conventional terms. Boneyard90 (talk) 18:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Guedes
editCan it be definitively said that Jose Guedes is/was the Lisbon Ripper? Has he been linked to the crimes in any other way than being denounced by his son or confessing to the media? It wouldn't be the first time someone confessed to a crime they did not commit---remember John Mark Karr? The 2000 murder was very dissimilar to the 1992-3 crimes, and it should also be noted that Guedes cannot be tried for the original murders due to Portuguese law. I'm unsure about whether the Wikipedia article should say that "Guedes is the Lisbon Ripper" when the case appears to be "Guedes is one person suspected of being the Lisbon Ripper." Thoughts?... Paris1127 (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
- Follow-up: Guedes's palm print did not match one found at a murder scene. http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/detalhe/noticias/nacional/portugal/estripador-nao-esta-no-sistema and now he's denying that he committed the Lisbon Ripper murders. And the police seem to believe him. The page should be fixed. Paris1127 (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Lisbon Ripper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114212023/http://ultimahora.publico.clix.pt/noticia.aspx?id=1300953 to http://ultimahora.publico.clix.pt/noticia.aspx?id=1300953
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071017133513/http://dn.sapo.pt/2007/07/31/cidades/primeiro_crime_estripador_lisboa_pre.html to http://dn.sapo.pt/2007/07/31/cidades/primeiro_crime_estripador_lisboa_pre.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://geocities.com/verbal_plainfield/coldcases/lisbon.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://geocities.com/verbal_plainfield/coldcases/newbedford.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lisbon Ripper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120104224017/http://www.publico.pt/Sociedade/alegado-estripador-de-lisboa-denunciado-por-filho-que-queria-entrar-na-casa-dos-segredos-1523489 to http://www.publico.pt/Sociedade/alegado-estripador-de-lisboa-denunciado-por-filho-que-queria-entrar-na-casa-dos-segredos-1523489
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)