Wikipedia

Talk:List of Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page


As a courtesy to other contributors could we please explain controversial edit on the talk page -- not in edit summaries, where they serve as triggers for edit warring?

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  1. The edit summary for this edit says: "update / corrections / clarify / overliinked / WP not directory". I don't consider that sufficient. The contributor in question has, in the past, routinely used the single word edit summary "clarify" to describe extremely controversial edits. So this word is useless for any good faith contributor trying to understand whether this is an edit they need to look at. Contributor in question has been routinely removing the references that document that Guantanamo captives' identities were confused, and that official records listed them under different names.
  2. Contributor in question routinely changes every instance of "captive" to "detainee", without any real explanation.
  3. In this edit the edit summary "correct the false statement" is used to justify the excision of the term "in extrajudicial detention". Several dozen of the Guantanamo captives have had their habeas corpus petitions concluded, since the SCOTUS ruled Boumediene v. Bush that they were entitled to habeas review. In approximately three quarters of those habeas reviews the judges ruled in favor of the captives. And on those several dozen articles this contributor replaced "extrajudicial detention" with "unlawfully detained"'. Other contributors had concerns about this replacement. "Unlawfully detained" wasn't referenced. And, although IANAL, and I don't think any of us are, the rest of us thought that even if the term "unlawfully detained" was appropriate, after the judges ruling, it wasn't retroactive, so extrajudicial detention was still appropriate for the period prior to the habeas ruling. Now, WRT the 778 captives, without regard to whether "extrajudicial detention" currently applies to the limited number of captives who face charges before a military commission, or those whose habeas reviews concluded the DoD had no legal basis to hold them, they all spent several years in detention, without charge. So the edit summary "correct the false statement" is, at best, open to question.
  4. This edit innappropriately excises a valid reference, with the edit summary "redundant".
  5. This edit's edit summary justifies an excision saying: "based on the interpretation of a primary source". The contributor who made this edit has had good faith contributors explain to them, over and over again that they cannot simply excise well referenced neutrally written material on the basis of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. The material the excising contributor removed said:

        "Allegedly non-compliant while in detention, wouldn't get dressed, when ordered."

    The original document said:

        Detainee’s Conduct: Overall behavior has been generally non-compliant and aggressive. Detainee has failed to comply with guard’s instructions on a number of occasions. He has been informed to keep his clothes on and has repeatedly disregarded those orders and has stood in his cell naked.

    The statement in question is fully compliant with WP:SYNTH. Unfortunately, although it has been explained to this contributor, on several occasions that SYNTH only restricts "novel" interpretations, not summaries or paraphrases of interpretations clearly contained in the original WP:RS. They routinely insist on citing SYNTH to challenge material that neutrally summarizes what WP:RS state, when those WP:RS differ from their own personal opinions.

  6. This edit should have been referenced.

Every contributor's edits are open to good faith, policy-based review. This contributor routinely responds to concerns over their edits by characterizing those concerns as "filibustering" or "ownership". I continue to believe these characterizations are inappropriate. Geo Swan (talk) 20:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

WP:Ownership, fillibustering and other stuff

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I am not going to answer to the post above as it is a perfect example of WP:Ownership, fillibustering,ad hominum and i ask the courtesy of the contributer to remove or strike his post. Cheers! IQinn (talk) 00:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please understand that, like everyone else, your edits are open to collegial, good faith review. Good faith contributors voice their concerns when they see material being excised or rewritten in ways that concern them. I believe good faith contributors are just as entitled to voice their good faith policy-based concerns when they originally drafted the passages being excised or rewritten as they are when the edits in question are to passages written by a third party.
Please understand that, like everyone else, your edits are open to collegial, good faith review. Geo Swan (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Please understand that, like everyone else, your edits are open to collegial, good faith review. Good faith contributors voice their concerns when they see material being excised or rewritten in ways that concern them. I believe good faith contributors are just as entitled to voice their good faith policy-based concerns.
Please understand that, like everyone else, your edits are open to collegial, good faith review.
Please do strike, rewrite or remove your uncivil post above and please make sure it does apply with WP:Ownership and WP:Civil and please make sure that it does not has any ad hominum arguments and favorable comes in a short form to allow for a constructive debate. Thank you. IQinn (talk) 21:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec2005/d20051220barhoumichargesapproved.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:55, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 28 external links on List of Algerian detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Algerian_detainees_at_Guantanamo_Bay&oldid=1256561208"