This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. I note a few issues with this list article, its title, lead and members. In terms of:
List criteria (scope), while the title gives "proposed candidates for sainthood" the lead gives "individuals [..] for whom there is a public petition [..] declaring them to be a Servant of God". These are two different things. Being declared a Servant of God is not the same as being declared a saint. By definition. As such, either the title or the lead need updating or clarification.
List membership (and refs), while some of the list members are supported by reliable refs (confirming that the process for a related decree and/or for canonization has at least been discussed), many other list members are not supported by any such refs. Even where there are refs, they don't support the member's inclusion. In all honesty, there are several list entries which seem questionable as a result.
Unless these issues can be addressed, I frankly wonder whether this list should be pared-back to those list members that can be demonstrated to verifiably meet the inclusion criteria. Otherwise, how is this list not a relatively indiscriminate collection of names? Guliolopez (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
