Talk:List of Battlestar Galactica video games

Overabundance of Second Life information

This seems too much for this article. The section is more about Second Life and what you can do with it, rather than a Battlestar Galactica video game entry. That is to say, people won't be coming to this page to read that section, and seems only for Second Life users. Therefore it belongs on a Second Life page. Furthermore it cites no sources until the singular one in the NBC Universal dispute and comes off like a review or editorial in many places, clearly written by an opinionated Second Life user. Propose to trim this section down to a summary or basic concept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherman24x (talk • contribs) 08:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Bad link

It looks like the link to the freespace-related fan game is dead (indeed, its whole server is dead right now). If this lasts then we've no choice but to zap the link. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 23:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

A few edits

I've done a few things to fix the page up a bit. I fixed the grammar in the second section, added the BattlestarGalacticaTopics template, and edited the section titles to match the terminology used in other BSG articles. I'm also going to add links to this article to the BSG template. I haven't played any of the games, so I don't have much to add. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zorblek (talk • contribs) 23:13, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Re-imagined series game - good?

"The game receive an RTV rating of 92.67% only the fourth arcade game to be rated at over 90%."

What is RTV? How come any other site I've seen says this game is very bad. Gamespot gives it 5.5. Can someone else confirm this? --Ljvillanueva (talk) 07:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

RE: Metacritic has it listed with an average rating of 55%. I think it's safe enough to assume that whoever inserted that 'fact' is full of crap. I'm going to go ahead and remove that line. -mclawson (talk) 03:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

The new version, the proper 3d version, should be released this month, suprised no mention here. Made by Bigpoint, looks sweet —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.2.12 (talk) 07:42, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Split

I think the official BSG games deserve their own page, and if there's enough info on this article, we should split them right away. I own Battlestar Galactica (2003 video game) but haven't played it enough to contribute. Anybody up for the task? Punkalyptic (talk) 04:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of Battlestar Galactica video games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218141053/http://www.diaspora-game.com/faq.html to http://www.diaspora-game.com/faq.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120113214352/http://www.bsg-galactica.com/ to http://www.bsg-galactica.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131217145503/http://battlestarmercury.com/wordpress/ to http://www.battlestarmercury.com/wordpress
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060719154302/http://www.battlestargalacticagame.com/ to http://www.battlestargalacticagame.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120113214352/http://www.bsg-galactica.com/ to http://www.bsg-galactica.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)