Talk:List of Billboard Hot 100 top-ten singles in 2015

Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2015

Please change the list because the updated version for April 25th has come out. Thanks!

Fscak2015 (talk) 19:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done Page updated to include April 25, 2015 chart. MPFitz1968 (talk) 20:10, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2015

Hello, possibly think about adding a note stating that "Somebody" went back onto the charts as of May 2 so it doesn't look like 2 weeks continuous. Also, could you remove the protection on the page? I'm not perfect and I know whoever still has access to the page isn't either. We all make mistakes. Maybe for future reference you could just ban that user from making edits on that page. Thank you for your consideration. 173.49.88.9 (talk) 19:23, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done Note added to indicate "Somebody" by Natalie La Rose featuring Jeremih made re-entry into the top 10 on May 2.

As for unprotecting the page, you'll need to talk with Ericorbit who protected it. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Skrillex & Diplo, a.k.a., Jack Ü — Billboard credits as the former, NOT the latter

The song "Where Are U Now" is credited on the Billboard Hot 100 charts as by "Skrillex & Diplo With Justin Bieber", not "Jack Ü featuring Justin Bieber". (The song is at #9 on the July 25, 2015 chart.) Even though entering Skrillex & Diplo in the Wikipedia search redirects to Jack Ü, the official Billboard credits are what we go by, and they do not list the alternate name of Jack Ü. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Weeks in peak position?

This set of edits by 189.170.223.210 is interesting; it looks like they were adding in weeks in the peak position, in the peak position column, in the form of "peak x weeks". I reverted the edits because I felt it would be confusing to readers—if there is going to be this addition, the weeks should be in a separate column—but then there's also the question of notability and consistency (throughout the remaining articles in this series, which goes back to the year 1958). Don't know how anyone else feels about it, but aside from weeks at #1 (and perhaps #2), reporting the weeks in the peak spot is not notable; the way this article's tables are structured, it appears to be an all-or-nothing issue to add a weeks in peak position column, so I'm against the idea of doing that. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

I don't think its a good idea. Many moons ago people were adding weeks at #1 into charts tables and it was determined that kind of minutiae is WP:NOT##INFO. It just seems a bit much. - eo (talk) 11:50, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2018 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:35, 14 July 2018 (UTC)