Talk:List of ChuckleVision episodes

Latest comment: 14 years ago by TreasuryTag in topic Treasury Tag

Treasury Tag

edit

Treasury Tag always seems to want to undo the changes I have made to this article, even though his spelling and grammar are utter rubbish. Putting "series 20 is the very first series of chucklevision to have 6 epiodes where as their other series have 15 episodes. due to Paul and Barry having other commitments. series 20 only has 6 episodes." is not the correct grammar or spelling, as most people know you don't put full stops in the middle of sentences and that names begin with a CAPITAL, not lowercase. I have no idea why this person has reported my changes as vandalism, and I will continue to undo your changes. If you continue to put in incorrect spelling or grammar, I will report your changes as vandalism. Also, all of my information is verifiable as, like the user below says, these episodes were listed on the CBBC website, but are not listed there when the episodes are not being shown. Once again, I will undo any changes you make if you put in incorrect spelling or grammar.

My spelling and grammar are not "utter rubbish" – I actually have several qualifications in English Literature. You are required to list a reliable source for each and every piece of "information" you add to the article. Unsourced material will be deleted immediately. This is not difficult to understand. ╟─TreasuryTaghemicycle─╢ 15:19, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't see why the BBC isn't a reliable source of information. I will admit that the spelling and grammar is now correct, but the reason why I cannot "list" a reliable source is, once again, that the information is only there when the episodes are shown on TV. If you don't believe that my facts are correct, just ring the BBC on 03700 100 222. I will continue to undo the changes you have made, because the BBC IS a reliable source of information for programs that they make, and so you should shut up.

If you don't start behaving in a more constructive manner, you are rapidly going to find yourself editing in no manner at all.
This is not a difficult concept. You have to list, in a specific way, and I suggest you read this page that I'm linking to now to find out what that specific way is, a reliable source, for every piece of information you add to an article. I am particularly concerned about two paragraphs of what you keep inserting, because they are not able to be sourced simply from the episodes themselves (though the other bits also need to be referenced too, don't forget that)... All the episodes in Series 12-13 were originally 20 minutes in length, but in 2004 the BBC cut them down to 15 minutes in length to suit their schedule. The original length 20 minute episodes are very rarely broadcast, – who says? And, Series 20-21 all have 6 episodes due to the Chuckle Brothers having other commitments, such as the 2 theatre tours they completed in 2009 - Chuckletrek and A Christmas Chuckle, – the episodes themselves don't confirm this. ╟─TreasuryTagcabinet─╢ 09:31, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Wikiuser999111, you should engage in discussion to resolve problems, and not tell other Wikipedians to shut-up. Also, you can't keep reverting to your preferred version. I suggest you have a look at disruptive editing. PhilKnight (talk) 13:00, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is no specific article on the internet at the moment confirming those facts, but if you ask the BBC for their record of ChuckleVision episodes made, it does say that the original ones broadcast were 20 minutes, but they are now 15 minutes when being broadcast. Also, before Series 20, 21 started, the CBBC channel said that there would be only 6 episodes because the Chuckle Brothers were busy doing theatre performances. The two performances they did in 2009 were Chuckletrek and A Christmas Chuckle. If you want to confirm this, the website "http://www.thechucklebrothersontour.co.uk/" does list the shows, but is down at the moment. Because of this, you could ask any theatre which had their show - there are many! I will once again change the article back. You are always telling me to stop doing this, but you are always doing this yourself.

You've been blocked indefinitely, so I'll just reply for the record... if there is "no specific article on the internet at the moment confirming those facts" then they are not allowed to feature on Wikipedia, full stop (unless there happens to be a printed source or radio interview or something which clarifies the situation; unlikely in this case). ╟─TreasuryTagUK EYES ONLY─╢ 22:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Because my account "wikiuser999111" has been blocked - I don't see why, I am now "wikiuser999112". I don't know how many times I have to say that you just need to RING THE BBC ON 03700 100 222! Their enquiries department confirm what I mention in the article, and the two sentences that you have concerns about. I will revert the article AGAIN because you have no reason for saying that the facts aren't true. Because you change the article back again, ring the BBC and ask them if my facts are true or not. If they say they are, stop undoing my changes! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiuser999112 (talkcontribs) 20:46, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is not difficult.
I don't have to 'phone the BBC. With me so far?
You are required to list, in a special way which you can discover by clicking on this link, a reliable source for every piece of information you put on Wikipedia.
However, since you've been indefinitely blocked and have taken it upon yourself to disregard that, you'll be leaving us shortly. ╟─TreasuryTagSpeaker─╢ 20:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Series 21 (2009)

edit

TreasuryTag Felt the need to delete the entire episode listing I created for series 21. With the accusation "Don't add unsourced shit to articles. Why is this difficult for you to understand?." For your information, This information is sourced from the CBBC website at www.bbc.co.uk/cbbc which quite clearly gives episode listings for the week ahead and the episodes are tagged as 1/6, 2/6 etc. I added this detail into the 'edit summary' box to summise where this information was sourced. Yet the user still chose to delete it. The BBC website (producers of chucklevision) IS proof that there are SIX episodes in series 21 and the titles of each episode are factual and correct. Instead of deleting details, perhaps TreasuryTag should get his facts straight before changing things. A complaint about this user will be made to Wikipedia.



--92.3.120.250 (talk) 23:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC) Yet again TreasuryTag has deleted all of series 21 from the episode listing, a further source for the Episode details from series 21 is at http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/index.php?class=tvlistings&tvg_component=search&tvgSearchPhrase=chucklevision&tvgShowID=1903334&tvgPageNumber=1. He has no credible reason for deleting FACTUAL information with sources.Reply

I shall continue undoing TreasuryTag's actions until someone tells me why TVTimes and the CBBC website are not credible sources for this information, personally I think this user should be banned. All the information I have posted has a SOURCE, is FACTUALLY CORRECT, so why delete it?. The user is a troll!.

2007 series

edit

The episode descriptions are mainly copied verbatim from here.--Rambutan (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


Until we have an official announcement, can we not add further series. Hopefully the BBC will recommission, but until they do please leave it as it is. Dashwortley (talk) 00:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)Reply