Talk:List of D.N.Angel characters
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Magioladitis in topic Merging character pages
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merging character pages
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Resolved
– Per consensus, all character articles were merged to the list, with the final merges completed January 30, 2009Someone with experience with merging pages should begin merging and redirecting most of the D.N.Angel character pages to this page. Many of those pages have issues with listing every single event the character participated in the anime series and with the manga finally off from hiatus, listing every single chapter by chapter event.
Supporting characters like Emiko and Mio Hio should definitely be merged into this page while major characters like Daisuke and Dark may be able to have their own page, if they are rewritten. 142.58.132.26 (talk) 00:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- In general, I agree. I've fixed your merge suggestion tags, though, to use a single tag for a cleaner page. Few of the characters, if any, from this series have the necessary notability for separate articles. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 01:20, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, since merging isn't allowed until discussions have concluded, I have to agree that pretty much all the character pages (including the ones that aren't tagged yet, like Riku Harada and Satoshi Hiwatari) should be merged into the compilation page. Most of the information could probably be reduced to a paragraph or two at most for most of these pages, so they don't really have enough notability on their own. A22 (talk) 20:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support, per nom. G.A.Stalk 06:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Support. I'd also like to suggest at very least merging Rio Hikari, since the information on her page is pretty much exactly the same as the information on the compliation page. 24.84.218.226 (talk) 08:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Merge the lot. All of the information is in-universe and so they can't really sustain their own standalone articles. --Malkinann (talk) 00:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Delete individual characters. I think deletion is more appropriate.-- Magioladitis (talk) 10:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)- This isn't a deletion discussion, nor can merged articles simply be deleted per GFDL. They are valid redirects. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- They are not merged yet. Are they? I don;t think we need detailed character profiles. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- The merging is being completed, as is shown in its edit history. The merging is being done slowly so sources can also be added and rewriting done, as necessary, of the incoming an existing material. You may not think we "need detailed character profiles" and in general you are correct, but that isn't what this list is. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification. I support the merge then. Happy new year! -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- The merging is being completed, as is shown in its edit history. The merging is being done slowly so sources can also be added and rewriting done, as necessary, of the incoming an existing material. You may not think we "need detailed character profiles" and in general you are correct, but that isn't what this list is. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 19:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- They are not merged yet. Are they? I don;t think we need detailed character profiles. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- This isn't a deletion discussion, nor can merged articles simply be deleted per GFDL. They are valid redirects. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.