This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
For lack of a better word, a secondary publication issued by same or closely related rédaction. "Sister mag" if you will. Hopefully someone with expertise will go deeper into this article. MURGHdisc.12:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Ok. Thanks for the answer. I had the same understanding. I moved Vécu on a separated line, because it is mostly known as a standalone publication. It has only existed as Circus bipublication during a couple of years. Don't hesitate to revert it if you feel it inappropriate. Lvr21:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
No, that's fine. The "bi-publication" thing may not be such a hot idea anyway. I'm no expert, but it would be nice if the article bit got some more substance. Seems terribly easy for this to become a list.. MURGHdisc.23:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
