Wikipedia

Talk:List of Indian Premier League centuries

(Redirected from Talk:List of IPL centuries)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Diannaa in topic Prose implies all cricket players are male
Learn more about this page
Featured listList of Indian Premier League centuries is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 9, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
September 4, 2012Featured list candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list


Requested move

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: List of Indian Premier League centuries. →TSU tp* 08:48, 26 May 2012 (UTC)Reply


List of IPL centuries → List of Indian Premier League centuries – The term "IPL" is ambiguous and can refer to many things, including some other sports leagues. See the IPL disambiguation page. jfd34 (talk) 07:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removed nowrap

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have removed the nowrap because it caused part of the table to be hidden. I increased the table width to 100% so that the text does not wrap if the screen is large enough, without causing any problem for smaller screens. Also I have made the images horizontal and moved them to a separate "Gallery" section. jfd34 (talk) 15:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

No. column

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago8 comments7 people in discussion

Hi folks! I am opening a thread here to get a clear consensus on whether to have a "No." column or not. I personally believe that the lead already mentions the number of centuries, and due to the size of the table, this column is unnecessary. One alternative can be to replace it with the "Inn." column, but that would be a bad option. Also the table is listed in chronological order, and can be later sorted in the same manner using the "date" column. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 14:47, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I also believe that the number column is just occupying extra space as this is a rather small list. TheSpecialUser TSU 15:06, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Said it before, will say it again, no need for this "No." col. The total number is handled in other places and the order in which they were scored is handled by sorting by date. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
No issues for me. —Vensatry (Ping me) 18:54, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree that it is unnecessary, but personally I would move the player name earlier in the table: either the first or second column. I know that it is a table of centuries, but the name of the player is probably a more important statistic than the actual score. Harrias talk 19:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Not a big deal for me. Zia Khan 20:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
@Harrias I tend to follow existing FLs here. Also the player column is already highlighted. However in case someone thinks that moving is a better choice, I will be happy to implement it. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 10:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree with Vibhi that "No." column is not necessary. Certainly not at the expense of Inn. column. As far as moving player's names to first column then it is not a problem.--Vyom25 (talk) 10:19, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Don't you guys think a McCullum pic is lacking in the gallery? extra999 (talk) 16:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yeah it is. I will add it tomorrow (preparing alt text takes time). :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 17:33, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
  Done :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 07:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistent table format

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I was looking at the table format under the section Centuries. What I noticed was that column of the first 36 entries in the table have a format which is as follows:

{{sort|<a number>|<batsman score>}}

The next 10 entries just have the score in the first column. I suggest that we come up with a consistent format for the table.

Shashi (talk) 19:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of Indian Premier League centuries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 18 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of Indian Premier League centuries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on List of Indian Premier League centuries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Prose implies all cricket players are male

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The prose in this article implies that all cricket players are male (as in "and his number of centuries is generally recorded in his career statistics"). Surely women also play cricket? — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:25, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Indian_Premier_League_centuries&oldid=1207810944"