Article concerning the book?

edit

I used a particular search engine to check on book title and author, and they appear fairly legitimate, more the author than the book. An article concerning either the author and/or his works would probably be far more acceptable. (All "IMHO".)Ernstwll]] 18:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

thenwriteone. In the meantime we do not delete articles because they are old, because they are orphaned, or because they have cleanup issues. we fix them. DGG (talk) 05:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

This page, which is a list of purported Japanese spies, is atrocious in form and content. There is little substanaytiation to any of these names, in terms of explanation or references. Worse yet, the Wikipedia entries to many of these names often don't mention any espionage activities connected with Japan at all. I think the entire article should be redone or deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.174.140.32 (talk) 04:26, 25 January 2009 (UTC) And don't forget to sub pewdiepie y'all! don't let series win!!!Reply

  The redirect List of Some Japanese secret agents(1930s to ww2 period) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 18 § List of Some Japanese secret agents(1930s to ww2 period) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:48, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply