This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 14 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Consensus not to merge, but to link to summaries on season pages
Oppose The current season articles follow the pattern of Friends (season 1), The Cleveland Show (season 1), and other television series articles. The two extant individual season articles are already 41K and 56K, respectively. Combined they would yield an article nearly 100K in size, far too large by the usual standards. As this series is both widely discussed in the media and draws strong ratings for the Travel Channel, it's reasonable to presume that the series will continue for several future seasons thus further inflating the byte count of a monolithic list. As both season lists are well-documented, it would not be reasonable to slash the text solely for the purpose of an artificially low byte-count. - Dravecky (talk) 05:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Weak Oppose I agree with Dravecky about the size of the page List of Man v. Food episodes. I can foresee that in a very short time there would be pressure to trim the episode details in order to reduce the article size. I like the amount of individual episode detail the way it is now. And I don't want to lose the pictures! At the same time, I note the amount of identical information presented in the two articles. Centrepull (talk) 09:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Comment. I agree that size is an important factor, and that merge may therefore be unwise. I still don't like the amount of redundancy, though. Maybe List of Man v. Food episodes should be shortened and linked to the other pages? How is this covered for other multi-season television programs? Cnilep (talk) 14:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.