Talk:List of Maryland Terrapins football honorees

List of Maryland Terrapins football honorees is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on December 31, 2018.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 5, 2009	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

College football Mid‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pre-FAC check

Latest comment: 15 years ago10 comments4 people in discussion

Excellent work all around. I gave the article a copy edit, but it appears ready to go for FAC, and I'll be happy to support it. I have just three quick comments:

The lede refers to "sixty-two former football lettermen and two former head coaches who were not alumni" in the University of Maryland Athletic Hall of Fame, but the relevant section breaks it down as "fifty-nine football players, two head football coaches, and three individuals who served in both capacities". Because they're phrased differently, it's a bit awkward determining who falls in which category.
Also in that Hall of Fame section, it isn't immediately apparent what the first two tables represent. There's no title above them, and you have to look at the column headers before you can say, OK; one is for coaches and the other is for players, and they're both in the college football hall of fame.
One minor problem that isn't crucial is the caption accompanying the picture of the Pro Football Hall of Fame. By mentioning the college hall first, the reader's mind automatically assumes that this is a picture of the college hall. It's not, but you don't discover that until you read all the way through the caption, which is kind of long; some readers won't make it that far and will get the wrong impression. Try shortening it by saying "Two former Terrapins players have been inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame (pictured): Stan Jones and Randy White."

Let me know when you submit this for FLC; I'm willing to offer my support. It's a great article. JKBrooks85 (talk) 06:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the thorough copy-edit. I also believe I've now addressed the three issues above. Strikehold (talk) 09:58, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

For the two photos from the Maryland university library, proof needs to be shown that they were published before 1923, not merely created.
"and it has participated in the sport all but one season since its inception." Should it be "in all but one season", or am I reading it improperly?
Images are caused text to be sandwiched in All-conference honorees.
For players whose first names are initials, have a space before the second initial.
Hall of Fame inductees: give the full name of the National Football Conference.
Reference 12 (Southern Conference Football Media Guide) should have pp. for its page range, instead of p. To fix this, simply change the page= parameter in the template to pages=.
A bunch of website links needs access dates. Giants2008 (17-14) 21:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll try to address all of these. Not sure on the "all but one" thing; I could see it either way. Strikehold (talk) 23:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

TonyTheTiger comments

Great work I would like to see Michigan football have such an article. In fact all schools should.
Is ascendancy properly used.

I believe so, but I'm open to suggestions for a different word. Strikehold (talk) 07:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

"In total, Terrapins have been named. . ." are you talking first-team AA and first-team All-conference or do you count 2nd, 3rd and/or honorable mention. I think you just mean first.

Those numbers (55/188) are for any of the three teams in one year—the number of rows in the tables in other words. That's why I used "...named to an All-America...", which might be a little subtle of a qualifier, but it is hard to phrase exactly right, clearly, and in a concise way, because of the many selectors, players selected in multiple years, and players selected to different teams by different selectors in the same year, etc. Honorable mentions are disregarded entirely for the purposes of this list since they aren't actually All-Americans (hence the term, which to me means essentially 'you did good, but didn't make the cut'). Strikehold (talk) 07:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

You might also list NFL All-Pro and NFL first-round draft choices.

I created another article where those would probably fit in better, List of Maryland Terrapins in professional football. I in fact started annotating All-Pros there, but haven't really put much effort into it. Maybe I'll take the time to work on that one at some point. Strikehold (talk) 07:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have never heard of a points system. In fact, I thought the term consensus meant first team on at least half of the recognized lists. At least for some time this was the definition. Of course, unanimous meant first team on all lists. I do not see your definition in your source.

I could have sworn that I read that in the cited reference, but it doesn't say anything about points. I know I read it somewhere, so I did some searching and found this from the NCAA (and I'll replace the cited ref in the article):
The NCAA compiles consensus all-America teams in the sports of Division I-FBS football and Division I men’s basketball. These teams are compiled from a point system computed from at least four different all-America teams named by coaches associations or media sources. The point system consists of three points for first team, two points for second team and three [sic] points for third team. No honorable mention or fourth team or lower are used in the computation. In football, the teams are compiled by position and the player accumulating the most points at each position is named first team consensus all-American..."
I imagine at some point there wasn't a point system, and the title was simply awarded to whoever had the majority of first-team honors. I also assume at some point they had enough times when no single player got majority from the selectors and decided they needed a better system. Strikehold (talk) 07:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

You may want to mention that over time the recognized selectors change.

That's in there:
"...The individual who receives the most points at his position is called a consensus All-American.[6] Over time, the sources used to determine the consensus selections have varied. Currently, the NCAA uses five selectors..."

Overall the prose reads nicely.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the comments (and the compliments). This is now at FLC, so if you're satisfied with my changes/responses, I'd greatly appreciate it if you could lend your support there. Strikehold (talk) 07:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Winningest in sports articles under discussion

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#"winningest" in sports articles. Until consensus is reached, articles should be reverted to the previous stable version, per the policy WP:NOCONSENSUS: "In discussions of proposals to add, modify or remove material in articles, a lack of consensus commonly results in retaining the version of the article as it was prior to the proposal or bold edit." —Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on List of Maryland Terrapins football honorees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of Maryland Terrapins football honorees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Maryland Terrapins football honorees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Maryland Terrapins football honorees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120322100745/http://www.theacc.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/072302aag.html to http://www.theacc.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/072302aag.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 6 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic