This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Harrison, Stephen (26 July 2021). "How to Use Wikipedia When You're Watching the Olympics". Slate. Retrieved 27 July 2021. ... brave souls might venture way back into Wikipedia's Olympic history vault with articles like "List of Olympic Medalists in Art Competitions," which covers the 146 medalists in the art competitions that were part of the Games from 1912 until 1948.
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article doesnt mention anything or links to the subject (As in the "medals" section). What "medals" was a gold medal won for? that makes no sense. The lead is far to massive and covers stuff that should be background/history. It seems everything thats not list is lead and thats not the purpose of a lead. Further none of the lists are tagged with any refs.
Also per CCC, things can change. the nature of WP indicated there can be other issues that were not visible to others.
As for the FL listed above it was woefully short and inadequate. "Support – Meets FL standards" doesnt explain anything and was mere vote counting. IT also only deal with technical aspects and not content where a featured status needs to be clear and thorough. All in all it was poorly promoted and reflective of the process.(Lihaas (talk) 23:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)).Reply
To me this seems like WP:IDONTLIKEIT; I see personal opinions but no policies cited. I'm not convinced but, then again, I'm obviously not likely to be, so why not take it to WP:FLCR then and get a community assessment? CanadianPaul00:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)Reply