Talk:List of Rhodesian flags

Latest comment: 10 years ago by NukeofEarl in topic Merge

Zimbabwe or Rhodesia?

edit

Shouldn't this article be titled "Flags of Zimbabwe"?

edit

The image Image:President Rhodesia Flag.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was No Consensus. The main problem here is the proposal fails to identify a destination article. To answer Cliftonian's objection, the articles could easily be merged to "List of Rhodesian and Zimbabwean flags". I don't feel comfortable putting forth a renewed merge proposal, but if anyone else wishes to do so, drop me a line on my talk page and I'll be happy to contribute to the discussion. NukeofEarl (talk) 15:01, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

A definite scarcity of enthusiasm for discussion on this or the above topics.... I support the proposal as; a) there need not be two articles about the flags of a country and in fact why not combine flags of Rhodesia and flags of Zimbabwe? and; b) the choice of 1896 as a starting point is a poor one as it marks no boundary in administration or territory delineation and the BSAC flag was in use in the territory from 1890 anyway. --Sinazita (talk) 08:34, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Strong support: These two should have merged a long time ago. Charles Essie (talk) 23:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Weak oppose, I think it's convenient to have separate pages for the pre-1980 and post-1980 flags, and of course describing a flag as "Zimbabwean" in a pre-1980 context is not really correct, but I'm happy to go along with consensus. Cliftonian (talk) 07:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.