Talk:List of Scandal episodes
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Scandal episodes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because...i am not done editing. the only reason someone sees that it should be deleted is because they came in, in the middle of editing and saw nothing. so please let the page stay
- This page needs to go. It's way to premature to exist. An episode list page should only be created if there is sufficient notability, such as a back-order of additional episodes or a second season renewal. Scandal has neither. This is not the first time that Jerems45 has prematurely created articles of this nature. They weren't needed then and this is not needed now. Delete it and if the show is successful, it can be re-created later. Until then, this is just wasted space. SchrutedIt08 (talk) 04:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- I also agree that this page needs to be removed as there is only a red table. It is just taking up space that could be used for a useful page (unlike this one) Thetechexpert (talk) 04:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Merge Page or Delete Page
editThis page i think needs to be merged with Scandal (TV series) since they are the same article or I think this page should just be deleted since Wikipedia already has a page like this one. Thetechexpert (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Merge: In my opinion, the contents of Scandal (Season 1) should be merged to Scandal (TV series), and both articles (the season 1 article and this article) should be redirected there. When the premiere gets closer and there is much more coverage and information, this article should be recreated. The season 1 article should stay redirected (or deleted) for several more years until the article is long enough to justify a split. There's especially no reason to have a season 1 article when there's only one season. Kevinbrogers (talk) 04:45, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Already merged the season 1 article. There was no point in even discussing that; it had to go. As for this one, merge or delete, makes no difference to me as long as it's gone. It's just not needed at this point. SchrutedIt08 (talk) 06:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- There was nothing to merge, it is not needed at this point since no episodes have even aired. GB fan 15:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Already merged the season 1 article. There was no point in even discussing that; it had to go. As for this one, merge or delete, makes no difference to me as long as it's gone. It's just not needed at this point. SchrutedIt08 (talk) 06:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Scandal episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YifxgqG8?url=http://deadline.com/2015/05/2014-15-full-tv-season-ratings-shows-rankings-1201431167/ to http://deadline.com/2015/05/2014-15-full-tv-season-ratings-shows-rankings-1201431167/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:51, 19 May 2017 (UTC)