Talk:List of U.S. aircraft gun pods

Added OP-2E to use of M18 and SUU-11/A Series

The Navy OP-2E also carried this weapon (used by VO-67) and the AAP2H (used by VAH-21)

Untitled

Thanks for adding this article. I've been interested in this subject in the past, but found little solid info on the internet. Drutt (talk) 23:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Microgun pod

In Col. Chinn's "Machine Gun, vol. V" there is a section on a gun pod with an XM214 5.56mm gatling gun. The pod was developed by General Electric. There is a sketch of the unit, but he doesn't give an official designation and I'm guessing none were actually built. Anyone else have any info on this gun pod? Chasrob (talk) 21:58, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

The XM214 was never put into a pod... at least not by General Electric (now known as General Dynamics Armament and Technical Products, developer of the XM214). I can research the exact number, but only roughly 14 XM214 weapons were ever built. VTFirefly911 (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of U.S. aircraft gun pods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100905111603/http://tri.army.mil/LC/CS/csa/aaarmsys.htm to http://tri.army.mil/LC/CS/csa/aaarmsys.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100905111603/http://tri.army.mil/LC/CS/csa/aaarmsys.htm to http://tri.army.mil/LC/CS/csa/aaarmsys.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

§ Descriptions of models – bullets to subsections

Hi y'all, I initially came to this article via a wikilink in GAU-8_Avenger#Variants which had just targeted the head of the article with a wikilink from a specific model name (as so: [[U.S. aircraft gun pods|GPU-5/A]]). This led to some wp:confusion on my part upon arriving as I'd expected to be brought to more specific info on a particular minigun system (GPU-5/A), not to a general lede summary about U.S. aircraft gun pods. I eventually scrolled down and found what I was after as a bullet point under the #Descriptions of models section. I followed up by first refining the original wikilink,[1] and then refined further by setting up a Template:Anchor instance.[2][3][4] However, while this solved the issue I'd encountered in a narrow sense, for a specific model, it's occurred to me that there remains a more general issue in place for others who may want to link other such items in the section.

Rather than expect others to remember to put {{anchor}} instances in place each time, it seems simpler to just convert the existing boldfaced bullet points into—readily wikilinkable—subsection titles (like === XM12/M12 and SUU-16/A ===, etc.). This would have the 'added bonus' feature of automatically also listing each in the TOC to aid readers arriving at the top of the page – as I initially had. I suppose one might alternately proactively add custom {{anchor}} instances manually in advance to each existing bullet point – but such an approach seems to be lacking in discoverability as editors would have to examine the markup code of the article to know they were in place (and no TOC 'bonus'). So at present, I will implement the subsection solution.
Thanks for your time and attention,
--A Fellow Editor (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2017 (UTC)