Talk:List of United States cities by crime rate

Latest comment: 1 year ago by TempestSounds in topic Garden City, Kansas error


Untitled

edit

i didnt know i could edit Three-digit numbers are sorted separately from four-digit numbers, from five-digit, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.213.186 (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why does the chart list New Orleans twice, with two different sets of data? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.56.57.52 (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The crime rates for Chicago are still using the wrong scale, and are far higher than every other city in this chart —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.59.183 (talk) 09:53, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will be about as clear as possible, someone fucked up the charts big time, it is suppoused to be the rate per 100,000 but these values are for per 1,000 it appears

The article includes the text "However, in some cases such as Charlotte, Honolulu and Las Vegas, the reporting agency as more than one city." -- what does this mean?

Deicas (talk) 19:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't this have been replaced by now with the 2007 statistics? -September 18, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.167.249.97 (talk) 22:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Usage of 'rates' seems to add ambiguity since no units are listed on the tables. If I understand the data correctly "Crimes recorded for cities with populations greater than 250,000 in 2006" etc. would be more appropriate. --Jahelmke (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


The county of Tim Dennisville US potatoes

experices little crime rate, with the expansion of many family's, and indeed can be considered the greatest county for crime in all the Untied States. 

By Tim the thrid of Loglasie

I would have to disagree with the article above, McDennive is far superior in crime rate

hi

-- Wow, I didn't know Los Angeles was that low in terms of homocide...I thought it would at least be in the top 10.

Just curious as to how Southfield Michigan can be in both the 100 lowest AND 100 highest violent crime rate lists. Perhaps the laws of physics don't apply there. I live very close to Southfield, and I'm quite certain the violent crime rate is not 0 as reported in the "100 lowest violent crime rate" table. This table should be corrected and updated, and it would also be helpful if the "100 highest crime rate" table was inverted so that the highest crime rate appeared at the top instead of the bottom. (westmt01, Troy, Michigan)

Clearly looks like an error. I'll look into generating new tables, like the homicides one - probably for cities over 50,000 population and not 10,000. -Aude (talk | contribs) 15:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think there is a clarification needed, I wasn't able to find out if the rates really are in incidents per 100.000 and per year. (or if it's per month or whatever)

Aron —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.234.158.56 (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Crime rates for cities with populations greater than 250,000 in 2006" Usage of rates seems to add ambiguity since no units are listed on the tables. If I understand the data correctly "Crimes recorded for cities with populations greater than 250,000 in 2006" etc. would be more appropriate.

There would appear to be an error in the sorting of the table. The column for property crimes is somehow not considering numbers greater than 10,000 and has St Louis in the wrong place when you sort by this column. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.170.216 (talk) 23:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

What is CBD? (second paragraph of article) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhumbo (talkcontribs) 22:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Stats are out of date and appear to be raw data (aggregate figures) rather than rates. The word rate is being used improperly in the title.LeValley 03:49, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

2005 Data

edit

As of September 26, 2006, the 2005 data is available. If nobody gets to it before me, I will change some criteria (e.g., city size cut off at 300,000 rather than 400 on murder rate) and changing the criteria for most dangerous and least dangerous as the basis of population is misleading (where one crime can alter a small town's standing). All I have to do now is figure how to easily do Wiki tables. Americasroof 20:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Moving 2004 data

edit

When I rewrite the tables, I will move this article and discussion to United States cities by crime rate (2004) Americasroof 21:02, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Column header "state"

edit

The header "state" is not correct, since the list also contains "District of Columbia", which is not a state. I advocate changing the header of the first column in the table to "territory", "district" or something more general. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.58.146 (talk) 18:37, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Territory has a very specific legal definition that neither states nor the District of Columbia meet. One title is correct for 0%, one for 98%. I think 98% (state) is better. --OuroborosCobra (talk) 19:25, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

MSA data

edit

The by-city rankings have been criticized as being inaccurate due to the arbitrariness of which suburbs, if any, are included in a city's legal boundries. Some people say that statistics by Metropolitan Statistical Area are more meaningful. The 2005 MSA crime stats are available from the FBI [1] and would make an excellent companion article. -- Beland 18:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

FBI Cities Crime Ranking

edit

The FBI provides data an crime for cities and MSAs. But it specifically cautions against ranking cities against each other. City limit configurations within large MSAs vary widely between those just encircling the old inner core areas of an MSA - (city A), to those that include most of the low crime affluent suburbs of their MSA (city B). So ranking by city limits is wildly inaccurate and unfair for cities within large MSAs, and says nothing about whether one is safer in the core of city A or city B, or whether one is safer in the suburbs of city A or city B. I suggest we just list the cities and their stats alphabetically, like the FBI does, to merely present the data, rather than try to "rank" by city limits.

If we must have a ranking, an MSA ranking might be more accurate, since MSA boundaries are defined by population statistics of a metro area, and not by arbitrary political boundaries. So comparing MSAs is closer to comparing apples and apples.

Gary Kreie 03:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Agree. Crime numbers are meaningful for cities, rates are not statistically meaningful necessarily. Crime varies by location within city boundaries. There may be more crimes committed within a small state than within a metro area for example. It would be more appropriate to list crime rates by metro area and numbers of crimes within cities. Ranking crime rates by cities is inappropriate according to the experts. The table should be changed to reflect numbers of crimes for cities.Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 15:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Murder vs Homicide statistics

edit

User:Taco325i edited the article and replaced Murder with Homicide. This has made those crime statistics invalid. -- Cameron Dewe 03:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

2006 Stats Now Available

edit

2006 Stats are now available http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/index.html

There's a great big disclaimer at the opening of the site cautioning against comparing cities. Americasroof 01:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rate vs. Rank

edit

Shouldn't the cities be ranked by murder rate per 100,000, rather than total murders? Johnbiggs 11:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Edit: It is, but they just forgot the decimals. I'll fix it. Johnbiggs 12:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Americasroof 13:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Wouldn't this page be more useful if it was organized by the rate of individual crimes rather than the total number?... I made this edit yesterday but someone reverted it back. At least the chart I added should be added as a second chart below. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.50.255.146 (talkcontribs) 16 November 2007
Using the rates rather than raw numbers is actually an improvement and I would be o.k. with nuking out the raw numbers. The cavets of course is that murder is the only crime that is absolutely reported. The other categories can be fudged (that's why I sorted on murder than violent crime). I reverted your edit yesterday as that was a drastic change and coming from an anonymous I.P. is always a red flag. I've always been attempting to protect the underlying numbers. Both the rates and the raw numbers could not exist on this page as both have pushed the size of the page to 95K which is too big. -- Americasroof (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

ranking rates is an inappropriate us of FBI statistics according to the FBI's website. Thomas Paine1776 (talk) 00:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Other Data

edit

Some of this data conflicts with City-data's list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.240.93.168 (talk) 18:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


I went to the FBI cited page, and did not see the source for this data - but I absolutely know that the data for Oakland is very incorrect. Oakland has been struggling with its too high homicide rate, and produced report, giving data which is 4 times higher than what is included in this artice, so it calls into question the accuracy of your data. http://www.urbanstrategies.org/programs/infotech/oak_homicides.html 67.169.96.5 (talk) 02:19, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

2007 Crime Numbers for Cities Available

edit

The latest crime numbers have been available, here, for quite some time now:

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2007/index.html

Anyone want to take a crack at updating the list? --Criticalthinker (talk) 02:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I took a crack at updating the list. The specific table is Table 8 http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/data/table_08.html However after compiling it and getting ready to post it, I discovered major integrity issues with the fed data starting with Kansas City, Missouri missing from the data (and no explanation for such an omission). Further there were huge population swings including New Orleans going from 400,000+ in 2006 100,000 in 2007. And that's just what I caught eyeballing it. I sent an email to UCR. Americasroof (talk) 03:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
The FBI responded to my email very quickly. The data is strictly based on cities meeting deadlines and apparently Kansas City, Missouri missed the deadline. The data on the website is still preliminary with the final coming out in February 2009. It is using the smaller New Orleans population now. I have it on my other computer and will try to post it tonight. Compiling it is a pain in the #@#$ especially if they are still changing it.Americasroof (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, but why are the decimals taken out of the murder rates, for instance, and what happen to the actual murder count? And what happen to the nice color dividers? It would seem that all that needed to be done was to change the numbers instead of changing the entire format, no? BTW, don't worry about them changing the numbers. People will change them as they change them, it was just imperative that we updated the numbers. --Criticalthinker (talk) 04:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I tried to keep it in the same structure as the original FBI spreadsheet and keep it strictly ratios rather than showing the numbers. The colors were not customary to Wikipedia. Americasroof (talk) 04:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but there were decimals in the murder rate, and the actual murder counts were listed. There is enough difference between say 45.1 and 45.9, so I'm not sure why you felt the need to dumb the list down to whole numbers.--Criticalthinker (talk) 03:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I will try to rerun it in the next week or so reflecting the decimals. This is one of those pages that opens a can of worms since it is often and subtitliy vandalized. 14:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Minneapolis Forcible Rate

edit

If I didn't know any better I think it was a fluke, but it appears to be a correctly calculated rate. Does Minneapolis just happen to report rape better than most other areas? I mean, the rate is three times that of Detroit. --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistencies

edit

If the title of this article is fully unqualified, it gives a presentation that appears to be comprehensive. The list seems to be a random selection of cities, as opposed to a ranking of some subgroup of U.S. cities, and as such gives an incomplete (or, in some instances, completely false interpretation of data. We need to qualify this list and then ensure that it contains a comprehensive list of those qualifications. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 00:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Inititial presentation of data

edit

Why is the initial presentation of crime data ranked by the murder rate? If we're trying to avoid "ranking" the cities and simply provide users with the data, then the cities should be ordered in a neutral manner, such as alphabetical by name. Best, epicAdam(talk) 01:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kansas City

edit

Why is Kansas City listed if there is no data for it? 131.215.171.162 (talk) 23:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

So that people know that there's no data for it and don't go looking. Best, epicAdam(talk) 23:26, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

2008 Stats Now Available

edit

Go check them out, and someone can begin changing the list:

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/08aprelim/index.html

--Criticalthinker (talk) 03:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Those stats are very preliminary. They don't even include half the cities on this list. I recommend that we wait until the fall when the full report is issued. Best, epicAdam(talk) 03:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well, now the full report is out:

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/index.html

--Criticalthinker (talk) 09:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The table is at http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2008/data/documents/08tbl08.xls It's a pain to parse (and per discussion we translate it to rates -- which the FBI cautions against). I've done it the last three years. I keep hoping somebody else will do it. If nobody comes forward in the next couple of weeks, I will do it again using the methodology of the past three years. Americasroof (talk) 15:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
I know what you mean, and it's probably why no one else is doing it. --173.104.22.74 (talk) 10:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
So, just to be clear, are you dead-set against updating this? --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I eliminated all formatting using http://excel2wiki.net/index.php which dramatically reduces the size of the article. The text needs tweaking but the 2008 data is at last up! Americasroof (talk) 22:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, what exactly is wrong with the text? If I know the problem, I may try to fix it, because it is rather distracting. --Criticalthinker (talk) 02:14, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's now 2009

edit

Why does this article still cite 2007 data? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.8.31.47 (talk) 02:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

2009 data now available

edit

The 2009 table is now available (following its usual schedule of being available each September) and the specific excel table is here. If somebody else wants to redo the page have at it, otherwise I will try to post the updated table in the next week.Americasroof (talk) 17:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Crime rate is per 1,000 not 100,000

edit

I notice that someone a long time ago noticed the bad math here. I've checked a few of the numbers and it appears they're consistently off by two decimal places. Just to be clear how I spotted and knew this to be in error: I was checking a 2010 news story from the CBC about the crime rate there, particularly Winnipeg. It was 4.1 per 100,000 in 2009. It stretched credulity to think that no American city could even be close to that. Detroit was 0.4! I checked story from the Star Tribune in Minneapolis from 2009 and, in 2008, there were 52 violent crimes per 100,000. So there's no way it could've dropped to 11.09 in a year.

So, I'm going to edit the page and if anybody objects, well, go ahead and explain yourself.

Here's the math, by the way:

To get at the per 1,000 rate: # of crimes / (population / 1,000) To get at the per 100,000 rate: # of crimes / (population / 100,000)

Ttu103 (talk) 20:49, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why didn't you ever get around to this? I completely agree with you. Why someone changed the measurement is beyond me.

Chicago

edit

Apparently Chicago is the crime capitol of the USA. The real crime is this chart is so inaccurate it either needs t be deleted or totally redone, as it is it is of no value whatsoever —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.174.242 (talk) 04:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

This was vandalism which I reverted. There was also a subtle vandalism here. Chicago's violent crime rate was intentionally left blank because its information was incomplete. That edit opened up a series of problems which in turn was vandalized again.Americasroof (talk) 17:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply


Incomplete info for Chicago with citations and notes would be preferable to "N/A" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.17.51 (talk) 20:32, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

2010

edit

The 2010 Uniform Crime Report is out (http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/preliminary-annual-ucr-jan-dec-2010/data-tables/table-4/table-4/view). Is there not some that tries to keep this stuff up to date, anymore? --Criticalthinker (talk) 11:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

That data is preliminary. The official data is released each September (as is mentioned in the article).Americasroof (talk) 12:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
The article says that the 2009 info was available in September 2009, so where is the info from September 2010, a full year ago? Was that a typo? --Criticalthinker (talk) 12:33, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
That was a typo (which I just fixed). I didn't update it last September when I updated the data. Incidentally the data for 2010 is still preliminary http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/crimestats Americasroof (talk) 14:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
They are now out: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10tbl08.xls/view

Two states, one city...

edit

I've noticed that cities that are split between two states are just labeled under one. For example, St. Louis is half in Missouri and half in Illinois. Kansas City is also split with Kansas and Missouri. However, these cities only show as being in Missouri which skews the actual data. This is a problem because in St. Louis if you cross the state border the laws greatly change. East St. Louis is in Illinois where the crime is much higher compared to West St. Louis, but the data places East St. Louis in Missouri. The laws are so different in these two states that the data reflects a state's crime rate incorrectly. When St. Louis pops up on Missouri and the crime is high due to East St. Louis it does not reflect correctly on Illinois and instead reflects incorrectly on Missouri. If the laws in Missouri vs Illinois are so different then the data will not represent anything useful and will instead create more confusion. All this, IMHO of course... 64.207.245.230 (talk) 17:42, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

East St. Louis, Illinois and Kansas City, Kansas are different legal entities from their bigger sister cities.Americasroof (talk) 18:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Indianapolis, IN is missing

edit

Obviously Indianapolis, IN is a U.S. city with > 250,000 pop.

It's data needs to be added (back?).

Kerander (talk) 20:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

There are no statistics because Indianapolis failed to report. -epicAdam(talk) 12:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

San Juan, Puerto Rico

edit

Yes, yes I know it's a territory and not a state but Puerto Ricans are native born US citizens and San Juan is an American city with 395,000 people. What are it's crime statistics? It should be pretty high on the list if not the highest violent crime rate in the nation.69.115.242.114 (talk) 00:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Puerto Rico crime data is not tracked by the FBI and is therefore not included here. epicAdam(talk) 01:41, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
PR was actually included in the data in 2011 but I did not include it.Americasroof (talk) 20:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Does anyone have an up to date source for crime data in San Juan or other municipalities of Puerto Rico? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.83.192 (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

2011 data

edit

The 2011 data which arrived significantly later than usual is presented in a manner by the FBI to make it difficult to make comparisons so it took considerable parsing. The new data is sorted by MSA's and so I had to parse out the cities as the FBI would prefer an analysis by metropolitan area (which is still difficult to parse). By restricting the presentation to MSA's the data does not include a lot of smaller towns that were included before. The data also no longer includes arson.Americasroof (talk) 20:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)~Reply

2011 data Henderson NV

edit

The 2011 data seems to have Henderson as it's own city apart from Las Vegas. Yet it is not on the table http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table8statecuts/table_8_offenses_known_to_law_enforcement_nevada_by_city_2011.xls Pacomartin (talk) 20:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Chicago error?

edit

Chicago

edit

Chicago's murder rate data reported here doesn't match what's on the 2011 report. It's not even close. Am I missing something? Rklawton (talk) 12:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ann Arbor vs New Orleans

edit

The article shows Ann Arbor has having the highest murder rate per 100,00 in america. The FBI MSA rate (on the cited link) is 2.3 (not the over 50 rate currently in the article). It also lists the population incorrectly. The listed population--346,974-- is actually the population of New Orleans, which is currently not listed on the chart. That said, the rest of the numbers aren't quite perfect for New Orleans either (also it used the City pop, not the full MSA).

It seems that at the very least someone confused Ann Arbor and New Orleans when they made the chart, but I wonder if there are bigger issues with the rest of the numbers?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:A:3D80:2B9:709C:8059:8369:EFC5 (talk) 23:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

2012 available now

edit

2012 is available. I will take a stab at parsing it in the next week or so unless somebody else wants to do it. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012 Americasroof (talk) 17:04, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Columbus Ohio not on the list?

edit

I came to this page looking for statistics on Columbus Ohio specifically, but I was confused when I didn't see it on the list. Any idea why not? 24.160.162.146 (talk) 03:05, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply


Criticism of ranking crime data

edit

This section of the article goes into a decent amount of detail as to how crime statistics are not an accurate portrayal of criminal behavior in a particular city. If that is the case, great, but it also begs the question as to what exactly is a better way to evaluate the impact of crimes in cities? Saying that figures are inaccurate is not a very convincing passage when no superior alternative is presented. This is particularly upsetting since many other articles use these same statistics for the success or failure of law enforcement initiatives, as evidenced Here. We must be consistent. We can't tote these numbers as a sign of progress on some articles and then turn around and say they are less than pertinent on others.--Supaflyrobby (talk) 14:21, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

They also fail to say why they are inaccurate. City Y has 100 homicides a year. City X has 500. Their argument seems to be along the lines, that City X has a poorer population, higher unemployment etc. That's an argument as to the causes of crime. It still does not erase the fact that these crimes are being committed. The facts remain, that City x's homicide rate is 5 times greater than Y's. The results are per capita/per 100k etc which means you can compare.

The only way the data can be skewed, is if there are reporting differences. e.g City X's inhabitants are more likely to report a rape, than city Y's. City Y's bureaucratic system is worse than X's. Their classification system or booking system is inadequate. No evidence of this has been put forward.

The data is legit. The criticism is political. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.44.149.144 (talk) 20:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

The data was just updated, but that means the page title is now wrong. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. -SColombo (talk) 23:12, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 19 February 2017

edit

Please update the table. Here is a 2015 version from the FBI source

State City Population Violent Crime Murder and

Nonnegligent Manslaughter

Rape Robbery Aggravated Assault Property Crime Burglary Larceny-Theft Motor Vehicle Theft Arson1
New Mexico Albuquerque 559,721 965.8 7.7 72.2 301.2 584.8 6073.2 1071.2 4076.7 925.3 15.9
California Anaheim 349,471 363.7 5.2 36.9 125.6 196.0 2872.3 422.4 1972.4 477.6 8.0
Alaska Anchorage 301,239 1070.9 8.6 171.6 206.1 684.5 3917.5 559.4 2975.0 383.1 35.2
Texas Arlington 387,565 502.1 2.1 53.7 136.5 309.9 3443.6 559.9 2657.1 226.5 7.5
Georgia Atlanta 464,710 1119.6 20.2 36.6 429.3 633.5 5499.3 1028.8 3549.1 921.4 10.8
Colorado Aurora 360,237 460.8 6.7 97.7 124.1 232.3 2936.7 467.2 2119.4 350.0 17.8
Texas Austin 938,728 372.5 2.5 51.9 99.0 219.2 3771.0 532.6 2990.0 248.3 9.7
California Bakersfield 373,887 484.1 5.9 19.0 175.2 284.0 4161.4 1036.9 2484.2 640.3 90.7
Maryland Baltimore 621,252 1535.9 55.4 46.2 694.2 740.1 4980.4 1248.6 2842.3 889.5 41.9
Massachusetts Boston 665,258 706.8 5.7 36.1 233.1 431.9 2316.1 354.3 1769.5 192.3 N/A
New York Buffalo 258,096 1118.6 15.9 67.0 400.2 635.4 4330.2 1076.0 2875.3 378.9 67.0
Arizona Chandler 258,875 189.3 0.4 30.5 44.0 114.3 2083.2 297.4 1686.9 98.9 17.4
North Carolina Charlotte-Mecklenburg 877,817 677.6 6.9 24.6 221.8 424.2 3767.9 769.5 2744.4 253.9 24.6
Illinois Chicago 2,728,695 903.8 17.5 52.5 353.6 480.2 2946.3 482.0 2089.7 374.6 19.6
California Chula Vista 265,215 265.8 2.3 23.8 90.1 149.7 1741.6 267.7 1166.2 307.7 10.2
Ohio Cincinnati 298,478 925.0 22.1 79.1 423.1 400.7 5510.0 1478.5 3642.8 388.6 147.4
Ohio Cleveland* 388,655 1334.3 16.2 124.0 769.3 424.8 5434.4 1787.7 2659.2 987.5 78.2
Colorado Colorado Springs 452,410 438.3 5.5 75.4 83.1 274.3 3648.0 533.6 2732.7 381.7 27.9
Ohio Columbus 847,745 546.3 9.1 95.1 264.2 177.9 3934.3 851.6 2715.6 367.2 47.8
Texas Corpus Christi 324,326 645.0 5.2 86.9 121.5 431.4 3465.6 674.6 2632.8 158.2 18.2
Texas Dallas 1,301,977 694.2 10.4 60.1 320.8 302.8 3440.2 854.2 2002.8 583.3 26.8
Colorado Denver 682,418 673.9 7.8 80.3 180.2 405.6 3529.9 697.8 2192.5 639.6 16.4
Michigan Detroit 673,225 1759.6 43.8 78.7 513.5 1123.5 4093.6 1161.6 2157.2 774.8 125.1
North Carolina Durham 257,911 847.2 13.2 28.7 286.1 519.2 4115.8 1234.5 2644.7 236.5 12.0
Texas El Paso 686,077 366.6 2.5 46.9 59.8 257.4 1914.2 206.8 1591.1 116.3 8.3
Indiana Fort Wayne 259,712 378.9 9.6 37.3 171.7 160.2 3058.4 569.9 2360.7 127.8 18.9
Texas Fort Worth 829,731 525.4 6.7 62.2 118.2 338.2 3585.7 723.7 2589.9 272.1 17.1
California Fresno 520,837 551.2 7.5 32.1 194.3 317.4 4148.3 850.4 2723.3 574.7 49.0
North Carolina Greensboro 285,950 597.0 9.1 25.2 185.3 377.3 3568.5 828.5 2551.5 188.5 34.6
Nevada Henderson 282,554 168.5 1.4 34.7 63.7 68.7 1893.1 479.9 1225.6 187.6 7.1
Hawaii Honolulu 999,307 243.9 1.5 31.8 89.7 120.9 3110.7 428.7 2294.6 387.4 23.1
Texas Houston 2,275,221 966.7 13.3 43.3 451.7 458.3 4397.5 872.8 2928.7 596.0 29.5
Indiana Indianapolis 863,675 1288.0 17.1 78.4 440.2 752.3 4790.8 1283.5 2929.5 577.9 N/A
California Irvine 258,198 55.8 0.8 10.5 22.1 22.5 1498.1 202.6 1217.7 77.8 3.1
Florida Jacksonville 867,258 648.3 11.2 54.3 161.2 421.6 3673.0 701.3 2704.6 267.0 8.2
New Jersey Jersey City 265,159 521.6 10.2 36.6 207.0 267.8 1594.9 368.1 998.6 228.2 23.4
Missouri Kansas City 473,373 1417.3 23.0 77.3 359.8 957.2 4441.3 1029.0 2587.6 824.7 41.8
Texas Laredo 256,280 379.3 3.1 51.9 63.2 261.0 3370.9 405.8 2843.8 121.4 34.3
Nevada Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department 1,562,134 920.7 8.1 70.9 320.7 521.0 2995.3 952.3 1537.0 506.0 8.6
Kentucky Lexington 314,077 332.4 4.8 51.9 162.7 113.0 3949.7 797.6 2834.0 318.1 15.0
Nebraska Lincoln 276,585 370.6 0.4 69.8 77.4 223.1 3265.9 480.1 2655.2 130.5 32.9
California Long Beach 476,318 580.7 7.6 37.2 221.3 314.7 3010.0 649.6 1766.3 594.1 14.5
California Los Angeles 3,962,726 634.8 7.1 55.7 225.9 346.0 2359.6 407.8 1544.2 407.6 28.5
Kentucky Louisville Metro 680,550 631.8 11.9 30.1 227.0 362.8 4166.0 922.3 2769.8 473.9 N/A
Tennessee Memphis 657,936 1740.1 20.5 80.6 475.9 1163.2 5630.8 1561.2 3655.2 414.3 45.9
Arizona Mesa 471,034 418.7 3.4 51.2 86.6 277.5 2527.4 471.1 1881.2 175.1 17.0
Florida Miami 437,969 1021.3 17.1 18.3 383.8 602.1 4367.4 709.9 3132.9 524.7 20.8
Wisconsin Milwaukee 600,400 1596.1 24.2 72.6 624.4 874.9 4264.2 912.9 2122.1 1229.2 37.1
Minnesota Minneapolis 413,479 1062.9 11.4 98.4 458.5 494.6 4193.9 859.8 2918.9 415.3 28.1
Alabama Mobile2 250,346 610.8 9.6 46.3 160.6 394.3 4311.6 882.0 3186.4 243.3 N/A
Tennessee Nashville Metropolitan 658,029 1101.0 10.9 77.0 280.7 732.3 3805.8 779.9 2805.8 220.1 8.1
Louisiana New Orleans 393,447 949.6 41.7 104.0 380.5 423.4 3874.2 736.6 2497.9 639.7 9.1
New York New York 8,550,861 585.8 4.1 26.2 198.2 357.2 1518.7 164.9 1267.4 86.4 N/A
New Jersey Newark* 279,110 1077.7 33.3 17.6 688.6 338.2 2851.2 622.0 1365.1 864.2 14.0
California Oakland 419,481 1442.5 20.3 67.9 784.3 570.0 5856.8 794.6 3539.1 1523.1 42.7
Oklahoma Oklahoma City 630,621 765.6 11.6 76.1 189.0 488.9 3956.1 923.4 2573.3 459.4 14.7
Nebraska Omaha 452,252 515.0 10.6 38.5 144.8 321.1 3595.6 477.6 2555.7 562.3 17.9
Florida Orlando 268,438 940.6 11.9 67.8 194.5 666.4 6015.5 1267.0 4309.0 439.6 14.5
Pennsylvania Philadelphia 1,567,810 1029.0 17.9 84.3 431.5 495.3 3147.4 515.6 2310.7 321.1 21.0
Arizona Phoenix 1,559,744 593.8 7.2 65.1 193.6 327.8 3491.3 820.5 2198.3 472.5 N/A
Pennsylvania Pittsburgh 306,870 706.2 18.6 26.7 279.6 381.3 3224.5 715.9 2312.7 195.8 56.0
Texas Plano 282,968 153.0 1.4 32.2 41.0 78.5 1799.1 260.1 1442.9 96.1 6.7
Oregon Portland* 615,672 472.8 4.2 42.6 137.6 288.5 5234.8 673.4 4013.0 548.3 27.0
North Carolina Raleigh** 428,993 392.3 2.8 18.4 141.0 230.1 3063.0 735.9 2162.7 164.3 12.6
California Riverside 323,064 446.0 3.1 42.4 161.0 239.6 3259.7 505.5 2211.3 542.9 22.0
California Sacramento 489,717 737.4 8.8 21.4 239.7 467.4 3369.5 758.2 2014.4 596.9 28.6
Texas San Antonio 1,463,586 587.2 6.4 71.7 135.7 373.4 5029.5 794.8 3812.8 422.0 17.8
California San Diego 1,400,467 398.6 2.6 40.4 98.4 257.1 2082.0 366.2 1351.9 363.9 12.4
California San Francisco 863,782 776.8 6.1 39.8 417.9 312.9 6138.0 600.4 4737.1 800.5 31.5
California San Jose 1,031,458 329.6 2.9 36.4 110.5 179.8 2427.1 474.7 1273.7 678.7 9.0
California Santa Ana 337,304 482.1 3.6 45.7 155.1 277.8 2155.3 269.5 1332.3 553.5 11.0
Washington Seattle 683,700 598.7 3.4 21.1 224.1 350.2 5522.0 1122.9 3831.9 567.2 13.5
Missouri St. Louis 317,095 1817.1 59.3 82.9 564.5 1110.4 6316.1 1325.2 3998.8 992.1 70.3
Minnesota St. Paul 300,721 703.3 5.3 67.8 237.4 392.7 3282.1 706.6 1994.2 581.3 39.9
Florida St. Petersburg 255,821 741.9 5.5 53.2 224.0 459.3 5622.7 906.5 4120.9 595.3 25.0
California Stockton 304,890 1352.0 16.1 44.3 375.2 916.4 4263.2 948.2 2662.9 652.0 33.8
Florida Tampa 364,383 630.7 9.3 21.1 184.1 416.0 2295.9 503.0 1629.3 163.6 14.8
Ohio Toledo 279,552 1128.9 8.6 81.6 322.7 716.1 4475.0 1476.3 2676.8 321.9 N/A
Arizona Tucson 529,675 655.5 5.9 79.7 199.9 370.0 6642.8 691.7 5586.8 364.2 22.1
Oklahoma Tulsa 401,520 903.6 13.7 90.9 212.7 586.3 5203.2 1372.8 3170.2 660.2 43.3
Virginia Virginia Beach 452,797 138.3 4.2 22.7 59.6 51.7 2205.6 211.1 1898.4 96.1 21.0
District Of Columbia Washington 672,228 1202.6 24.1 73.5 506.4 598.6 4516.2 442.0 3599.1 475.1 N/A
Kansas Wichita 389,824 984.8 6.9 89.5 188.0 700.3 5041.2 892.7 3623.9 524.6 33.1

Notes: * 2014 Data

** 2013 Data

1 The FBI does not publish arson data unless it receives data from either the agency or the state for all 12 months of the calendar year.

2 The population for the city of Mobile, Alabama, includes 55,819 inhabitants from the jurisdiction of the Mobile County Sheriff's Department.

73.223.97.97 (talk) 07:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
  Done — Train2104 (t • c) 15:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Inaccurate and Outdated Article

edit

This article is very inaccurate upon spot checking. For example, it says the data is from 2014 but lists Chicago's homicide rate as 28.7 per 100,000 people. This is extremely inaccurate. According to the FBI UCR table 6 from 2014 (https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014/tables/table-6), Chicago's homicide rate was 15.09 per 100K. Furthermore, this appears to be an attempt at introducing 2016 data into a table about 2014 rates. The official 2016 rate via the FBI UCR table 6 (https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/table-6/table-6.xls/view) was 28.07 per 100K for Chicago. As every city's data has not been updated, the ranking is therefore inaccurate (for example, Chicago in this table is listed as top 5 homicide rate, but in 2014 it was not top 15, and for 2016 it is 9th highest).

This article needs to be updated - it's misleading, inaccurate, and out of date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marothisu (talkcontribs) 23:53, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of United States cities by crime rate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

The city and state names in the table do not link to their respective articles. Also, the article title and the talk page title are inconsistent — the former is titled "List of United States cities by crime rate" while the latter is "List of United States cities by crime rate (2014)", even though the data in the article is actually from 2017. Can someone please add links? I am a new user — this page is semi-protected and I cannot edit it. Sanjay7373 (talk) 22:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Update: I just became an autoconfirmed user and added the links to the article myself. Sanjay7373 (talk) 00:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

It's 2019

edit

Can someone update the information to 2019 instead of 2014? Also, Why isn't Utah not on there? Does it mean Utah doesn't have any crimes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 25awesomeguy (talkcontribs) 03:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Why only cities, not all counties

edit

If WP just lists cities, that is very selective. Why not all counties?--Einar Moses Wohltun (talk) 19:29, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wrong statistics used for Mobile AL PLEASE HELP!

edit

Can someone help me and edit this page? The wrong statistics were used and Mobile, AL shouldn't be at the top of this list and I'm tired of correcting people.

https://mynbc15.com/news/local/wrong-crime-stats-used-to-rank-mobile-2nd-most-dangerous-in-country

The list Forbes published is based on analysis MoneyGeek performed using 2021 crime statistics reported to the FBI and academic research on the cost of crime. It showed Mobile was more dangerous than cities with higher murder rates like Birmingham, Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, and Cleveland. Somehow incorrect crime rates were reported to the FBI and then used in the analysis. There were 51 murders in 2021, not 111. There were 168 rape cases, not 584, 205 robberies, not 516 and just under 1,500 assaults, not nearly 5,000. Looneytunez188 (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

the chart no longer responds to resorting by any particular column heading.

edit

the chart no longer responds to resorting by any particular column heading. 47.153.162.64 (talk) 20:34, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Garden City, Kansas error

edit

Garden City Kansas is listed as having a population of 391,084 people when in reality it has only 28,151 (as per the 2020 census, anyway). Looking at the other statistics for this city, I think the wrong place is listed. Johnkhc (talk) 22:47, 19 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree, I think it's probably supposed to be Wichita, Kansas; the population lines up and I know Wichita has a higher than average crime rate, so the omission is a bit odd. I don't want to change it without a source but I'm almost certain that's the mistake. TempestSounds (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply