Talk:List of University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee people
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fujimori picture
editThe removal of the picture of Fujimori has been reverted several times, although it does not fall under the fair use claim on the picture. It was also stated once that the photo is here for "publicity". Who is this article doing publicity for? It shouldn't be. Another photo which was removed as a fair use violation remains on the page as well, but the Fujimori picture is cut-and-dried, fair use only for a certain event in time that has no connection to this article. Dekimasuよ! 09:19, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- The Fujimori picture shows whatever the publicity or event it shows in the Fujimori article. Miaers 15:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this is the correct route, but I've posted a notice on the Admin's notice board to help us resolve the problem with the image. Cheers, PaddyM 20:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- How does this fair use claim differ from that used to justify the use of the Phil Katz photo? --ElKevbo 22:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- The Phil Katz photo has been removed from the page a few times as well, but seemed to have a broader statement of fair use. I think both of them fail fair use. Dekimasuよ! 02:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- How does this fair use claim differ from that used to justify the use of the Phil Katz photo? --ElKevbo 22:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this is the correct route, but I've posted a notice on the Admin's notice board to help us resolve the problem with the image. Cheers, PaddyM 20:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
There is no difference. They both show whatever the publicity or event they show in their bio articles. Miaers 22:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- That's not how fair use works, unless you are actually talking about the illustrated event in this article. The fair use policy clearly states that these types of photos cannot be used for decorative purposes. Dekimasuよ! 02:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- In that case, I don't see the problem. I'll remove them both. Cheers, PaddyM 03:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
The Phil Katz photo is actually fairly used here, becasue the license indicates that it can be used to demonstrate the person if there is no replacement. Miaers 20:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- In light of the fact that Phil Katz is deceased, reducing the possibility that a free image replacement can be obtained, I have changed my mind. I think the original photo (but not the duplicate that was listed as GFDL) is acceptable for this article. Dekimasuよ! 20:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
The Phil Katz photo is used to show him as the inventor, not just for what he looks like. It doesn't matter he is a living person or not. Miaers 18:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Fujimori-press.jpg
editI notice the 'image' page for Image:Fujimori-press.jpg specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in List of University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee people constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in this List of University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee people article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jreferee 19:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
3rd opinion on red links to notable people
editHaving read the policy at WP:red link I think that red links should only be used where there is also an accompanying reference that shows the persons notability and evidence of the association with the list topic itself. In the absence of a proof of notability, the name should remain, but should no longer be linked.Rememberway (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929154926/http://www.biztimes.com/daily/2009/2/20/schwalbach-is-mount-mary-colleges-new-president to http://www.biztimes.com/daily/2009/2/20/schwalbach-is-mount-mary-colleges-new-president
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)