Talk:List of artists focused on the female form
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Felix Folio Secundus in topic [Untitled]
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
editThis seems like a rather ridiculous list, in my opinion. Few of these artists are very major, and how do we decide which of the major figures in art history were more "focused on the female form" than others? Is Matisse so focused? Is Goya so focused? Titian? Velasquez? Does the title mean "exclusively focused"? I don't see how this can be maintained. Lithoderm 18:40, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- The title suggests that these individual artists belong together because the female form appears prominently in their works. (??)--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 06:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)